NVDA vs. NLR

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock, while NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) is Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Over the past 10 years, NVDA returned 68.47%/yr vs 12.72%/yr for NLR. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NVDA vs. NLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 12.01% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's -0.79% return. Over the past 10 years, NVDA has outperformed NLR with an annualized return of 68.47%, while NLR has yielded a comparatively lower 12.72% annualized return.

NVDA

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: -2.94%
• YTD: 12.01%
• 6M: 12.58%
• 1Y: 47.43%
• 3Y*: 75.35%
• 5Y*: 64.54%
• 10Y*: 68.47%

NLR

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: -12.54%
• YTD: -0.79%
• 6M: -6.08%
• 1Y: 26.72%
• 3Y*: 31.16%
• 5Y*: 20.16%
• 10Y*: 12.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDA vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	12.01%	38.92%	171.25%	239.02%	-50.26%	125.48%	122.30%	76.94%	-30.82%	81.99%
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	-0.79%	56.50%	14.26%	36.67%	2.29%	13.63%	3.49%	0.20%	4.94%	8.25%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and NLR is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2007	0.38

Return for Risk

NVDA vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA

NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 77
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 73
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 79

NLR

NLR Risk / Return Rank: 22
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 21
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVDA	NLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	0.63	+0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	1.13	+0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.13	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	1.04	+1.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.73	2.08	+3.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVDA vs. NLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the NLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and NLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVDA	NLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	0.63	+0.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.25	0.69	+0.57
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.38	0.53	+0.85
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.16	+0.46

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, which is greater than NLR's maximum drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and NLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDA	NLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.72%	-65.05%	-24.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.21%	-25.80%	+5.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.88%	-30.48%	-6.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.34%	-30.48%	-35.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.34%	-34.35%	-31.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.39%	-25.03%	+13.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.20%	-35.71%	-0.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.30%	12.87%	-4.57%

Volatility

NVDA vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) have volatilities of 13.14% and 13.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDA	NLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.14%	13.36%	-0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.37%	33.24%	-6.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.81%	42.96%	-8.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.75%	29.43%	+22.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.85%	24.14%	+25.71%

Dividends

NVDA vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than NLR's 2.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	2.57%	2.55%	0.76%	4.54%	2.02%	1.99%	2.23%	2.21%	3.91%	4.86%	3.62%	3.30%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	0.14%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.11%	0.05%	0.12%	0.27%	0.46%	0.29%	0.45%	1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDA and NLR in my portfolio?

NVDA and NLR have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDA or NLR?

NLR has higher volatility (13.36%) compared to NVDA (13.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs NLR's -65.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.