PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDA vs. CPH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVDA vs. CPH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Cipher Pharmaceuticals Inc. (CPH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NVDA is traded in USD, while CPH.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CPH.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 12.01% return, which is significantly higher than CPH.TO's 10.08% return. Over the past 10 years, NVDA has outperformed CPH.TO with an annualized return of 68.47%, while CPH.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.91% annualized return.


NVDA

1D
1.73%
1M
-2.94%
YTD
12.01%
6M
12.58%
1Y
47.43%
3Y*
75.35%
5Y*
64.54%
10Y*
68.47%

CPH.TO

1D
-0.04%
1M
-16.23%
YTD
10.08%
6M
14.24%
1Y
24.86%
3Y*
62.35%
5Y*
56.53%
10Y*
7.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDA vs. CPH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
12.01%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%
CPH.TO
Cipher Pharmaceuticals Inc.
10.08%10.20%138.31%47.79%104.02%90.42%-36.49%-8.51%-67.81%7.26%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and CPH.TO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2006

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NVDA:

$5.09T

CPH.TO:

CA$435.58M

EPS

NVDA:

$6.53

CPH.TO:

CA$1.19

PE Ratio

NVDA:

31.97

CPH.TO:

14.22

PEG Ratio

NVDA:

0.18

CPH.TO:

0.17

PS Ratio

NVDA:

20.13

CPH.TO:

8.65

PB Ratio

NVDA:

26.03

CPH.TO:

3.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVDA:

$253.49B

CPH.TO:

CA$50.92M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVDA:

$187.95B

CPH.TO:

CA$37.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

NVDA:

$192.76B

CPH.TO:

CA$25.12M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDA vs. CPH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

CPH.TO
CPH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
CPH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CPH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA vs. CPH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Cipher Pharmaceuticals Inc. (CPH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDACPH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.15

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

1.03

+1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.73

2.22

+3.51

NVDA vs. CPH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the CPH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and CPH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDACPH.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

0.59

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.25

1.14

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.38

0.13

+1.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.07

+0.55

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. CPH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, smaller than the maximum CPH.TO drawdown of -98.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and CPH.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDACPH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.72%

-98.29%

+8.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

-24.22%

+4.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

-46.02%

+9.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

-46.02%

-20.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

-95.16%

+28.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.39%

-24.23%

+12.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-65.74%

+29.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.30%

11.22%

-2.92%

Volatility

NVDA vs. CPH.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is 13.14%, while Cipher Pharmaceuticals Inc. (CPH.TO) has a volatility of 13.93%. This indicates that NVDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CPH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDACPH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.14%

13.93%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.37%

28.17%

-1.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.81%

42.14%

-7.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.75%

49.98%

+1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.85%

61.43%

-11.58%

Dividends

NVDA vs. CPH.TO - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while CPH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPH.TO
Cipher Pharmaceuticals Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

NVDA vs. CPH.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NVIDIA Corporation and Cipher Pharmaceuticals Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
81.62B
12.30M
(NVDA) Total Revenue
(CPH.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. NVDA values in USD, CPH.TO values in CAD

NVDA vs. CPH.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NVIDIA Corporation and Cipher Pharmaceuticals Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
74.9%
67.9%
Portfolio components
NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

CPH.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cipher Pharmaceuticals Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.35M and revenue of 12.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.9%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

CPH.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cipher Pharmaceuticals Inc. reported an operating income of 5.50M and revenue of 12.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 44.7%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.

CPH.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cipher Pharmaceuticals Inc. reported a net income of 6.06M and revenue of 12.30M, resulting in a net margin of 49.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVDA and CPH.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDA and CPH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer