PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
NVDA vs. CBUK.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

NVDA vs. CBUK.DE

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock, while CBUK.DE (iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc) is Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Technology Sub-Industries ESG Screened Select Capped. Over the past 3 years, NVDA returned 75.35%/yr vs 16.45%/yr for CBUK.DE. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NVDA vs. CBUK.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUK.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NVDA is traded in USD, while CBUK.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CBUK.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 12.01% return, which is significantly higher than CBUK.DE's 1.42% return.

NVDA

1D
1.73%
1M
-2.94%
YTD
12.01%
6M
12.58%
1Y
47.43%
3Y*
75.35%
5Y*
64.54%
10Y*
68.47%

CBUK.DE

1D
-0.00%
1M
2.19%
YTD
1.42%
6M
0.11%
1Y
23.77%
3Y*
16.45%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDA vs. CBUK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation		12.01%38.92%171.25%239.02%-39.59%
CBUK.DE
iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc		1.42%36.66%11.30%-6.16%-3.64%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and CBUK.DE is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2022

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

NVIDIA Corporation

iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc

Often compared with NVDA:
NVDA vs. AMDNVDA vs. AAPLNVDA vs. AVGONVDA vs. TSMNVDA vs. SPYNVDA vs. AMZNNVDA vs. QQQ
Often compared with CBUK.DE:
CBUK.DE vs. CQQQCBUK.DE vs. MCHT.LCBUK.DE vs. CC1U.LCBUK.DE vs. AYEM.DECBUK.DE vs. LCHI.DECBUK.DE vs. ICGA.DECBUK.DE vs. 2B76.DE

Return for Risk

NVDA vs. CBUK.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
CBUK.DE
CBUK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CBUK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA vs. CBUK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

NVDACBUK.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.37
1.01

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.94
1.54

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.18

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

0.98

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.73

2.02

+3.71

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVDA vs. CBUK.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the CBUK.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and CBUK.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

NVDACBUK.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

1.01

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.25

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.38

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.25

+0.37

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. CBUK.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, which is greater than CBUK.DE's maximum drawdown of -40.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and CBUK.DE.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

NVDACBUK.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.72%

-40.42%

-49.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

-24.77%

+4.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

-26.84%

-10.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.39%

-12.17%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-15.58%

-20.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.30%

12.01%

-3.71%

Volatility

NVDA vs. CBUK.DE - Volatility Comparison

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a higher volatility of 13.14% compared to iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUK.DE) at 8.88%. This indicates that NVDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBUK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

NVDACBUK.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.14%

8.88%

+4.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.37%

17.21%

+9.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.81%

24.06%

+10.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.75%

33.03%

+18.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.85%

33.03%

+16.82%

Dividends

NVDA vs. CBUK.DE - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while CBUK.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBUK.DE
iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation		0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

NVDA and CBUK.DE have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDA and CBUK.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer