PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDA vs. AEM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVDA vs. AEM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NVDA is traded in USD, while AEM.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the AEM.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 12.01% return, which is significantly higher than AEM.TO's -4.24% return. Over the past 10 years, NVDA has outperformed AEM.TO with an annualized return of 68.47%, while AEM.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 14.22% annualized return.


NVDA

1D
1.73%
1M
-2.94%
YTD
12.01%
6M
12.58%
1Y
47.43%
3Y*
75.35%
5Y*
64.54%
10Y*
68.47%

AEM.TO

1D
-1.16%
1M
-16.08%
YTD
-4.24%
6M
-1.38%
1Y
38.35%
3Y*
49.91%
5Y*
20.77%
10Y*
14.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDA vs. AEM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
12.01%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
-4.24%119.66%46.16%9.25%1.57%-23.52%16.40%52.88%-11.65%11.09%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and AEM.TO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006

0.11

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NVDA:

$5.09T

AEM.TO:

CA$113.39B

EPS

NVDA:

$6.53

AEM.TO:

CA$10.65

PE Ratio

NVDA:

31.97

AEM.TO:

21.22

PEG Ratio

NVDA:

0.18

AEM.TO:

0.32

PS Ratio

NVDA:

20.13

AEM.TO:

8.38

PB Ratio

NVDA:

26.03

AEM.TO:

4.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVDA:

$253.49B

AEM.TO:

CA$13.56B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVDA:

$187.95B

AEM.TO:

CA$8.26B

EBITDA (TTM)

NVDA:

$192.76B

AEM.TO:

CA$9.54B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDA vs. AEM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

AEM.TO
AEM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
AEM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA vs. AEM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDAAEM.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.18

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

1.08

+1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.73

2.94

+2.79

NVDA vs. AEM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the AEM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and AEM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDAAEM.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

0.89

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.25

0.59

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.38

0.39

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.21

+0.42

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. AEM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, which is greater than AEM.TO's maximum drawdown of -74.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and AEM.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDAAEM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.72%

-74.20%

-15.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

-35.59%

+15.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

-35.59%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

-46.11%

-20.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

-54.30%

-12.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.39%

-35.59%

+24.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-34.31%

-1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.30%

13.08%

-4.78%

Volatility

NVDA vs. AEM.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is 13.14%, while Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) has a volatility of 14.82%. This indicates that NVDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDAAEM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.14%

14.82%

-1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.37%

35.00%

-8.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.81%

43.43%

-8.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.75%

35.66%

+16.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.85%

36.41%

+13.44%

Dividends

NVDA vs. AEM.TO - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than AEM.TO's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
1.04%0.97%1.95%2.98%2.81%2.08%1.34%0.81%0.80%0.77%0.75%0.95%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

NVDA vs. AEM.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NVIDIA Corporation and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
81.62B
4.10B
(NVDA) Total Revenue
(AEM.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. NVDA values in USD, AEM.TO values in CAD

NVDA vs. AEM.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NVIDIA Corporation and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
74.9%
66.4%
Portfolio components
NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

AEM.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 2.72B and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.4%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

AEM.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 2.56B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 62.4%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.

AEM.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 1.70B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 41.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVDA and AEM.TO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDA and AEM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer