NUKZ vs. FBMPX

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) and FBMPX (Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio) are both funds - NUKZ is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index, while FBMPX is a Communications Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past year, NUKZ returned 31.62% vs 32.45% for FBMPX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NUKZ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FBMPX.

Performance

NUKZ vs. FBMPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUKZ achieves a 7.72% return, which is significantly higher than FBMPX's 6.97% return.

NUKZ

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -6.54%
• YTD: 7.72%
• 6M: 3.81%
• 1Y: 31.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBMPX

• 1D: -2.81%
• 1M: -3.35%
• YTD: 6.97%
• 6M: 7.58%
• 1Y: 32.45%
• 3Y*: 33.06%
• 5Y*: 13.51%
• 10Y*: 16.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUKZ vs. FBMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	7.72%	56.57%	60.11%
FBMPX Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio	6.97%	37.07%	31.33%

Correlation

The correlation between NUKZ and FBMPX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024	0.56

The correlation between NUKZ and FBMPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

NUKZ vs. FBMPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NUKZ	FBMPX
Industrials	45.9%	0.3%
Utilities	35.8%	-
Energy	12.9%	-
Basic Materials	4.0%	-
Technology	1.4%	13.1%
Communication Services	-	83.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	2.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	0.7%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

NUKZ vs. FBMPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUKZ

NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 34
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 30
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 35

FBMPX

FBMPX Risk / Return Rank: 38
FBMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FBMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
FBMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
FBMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FBMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUKZ vs. FBMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NUKZ	FBMPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	1.81	-0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.59	2.49	-0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.32	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	2.06	-0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.79	7.74	-2.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NUKZ vs. FBMPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUKZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the FBMPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUKZ and FBMPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NUKZ	FBMPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.05	1.81	-0.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.63	0.65	+0.99

Drawdowns

NUKZ vs. FBMPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUKZ drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, smaller than the maximum FBMPX drawdown of -61.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKZ and FBMPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUKZ	FBMPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.03%	-61.77%	+28.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.51%	-16.90%	+0.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.20%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-47.42%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.27%	-5.72%	-4.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.02%	-10.63%	+4.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.62%	4.48%	+2.14%

Volatility

NUKZ vs. FBMPX - Volatility Comparison

Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) has a higher volatility of 10.20% compared to Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX) at 5.19%. This indicates that NUKZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBMPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NUKZ	FBMPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.20%	5.19%	+5.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.61%	14.24%	+8.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.26%	19.21%	+11.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.82%	23.28%	+9.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.82%	21.98%	+10.84%

NUKZ vs. FBMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUKZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FBMPX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

NUKZ vs. FBMPX - Dividend Comparison

NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than FBMPX's 12.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBMPX Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio	12.52%	8.09%	7.05%	0.00%	0.00%	5.88%	3.74%	35.43%	15.29%	5.53%	7.50%	7.29%
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	0.85%	0.91%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NUKZ and FBMPX in my portfolio?

NUKZ and FBMPX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NUKZ or FBMPX?

NUKZ has higher volatility (10.20%) compared to FBMPX (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUKZ dropped -33.03% vs FBMPX's -61.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.