PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTR vs. BIP-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NTR vs. BIP-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NTR is traded in USD, while BIP-UN.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the BIP-UN.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTR achieves a 9.80% return, which is significantly lower than BIP-UN.TO's 13.82% return.


NTR

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.54%
YTD
9.80%
6M
15.63%
1Y
16.58%
3Y*
8.74%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*

BIP-UN.TO

1D
-0.39%
1M
6.39%
YTD
13.82%
6M
12.37%
1Y
20.99%
3Y*
7.00%
5Y*
14.92%
10Y*
28.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTR vs. BIP-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NTR
Nutrien Ltd.
9.80%43.33%-16.97%-20.19%0.23%60.78%5.60%5.57%-11.36%
BIP-UN.TO
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P
13.82%15.30%6.27%7.08%20.25%27.91%17.32%52.53%-17.20%

Correlation

The correlation between NTR and BIP-UN.TO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2018

0.22

The correlation between NTR and BIP-UN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.25 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NTR:

$32.41B

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$24.85B

EPS

NTR:

$4.93

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$0.91

PE Ratio

NTR:

13.65

BIP-UN.TO:

59.66

PEG Ratio

NTR:

0.20

BIP-UN.TO:

0.31

PS Ratio

NTR:

1.17

BIP-UN.TO:

1.04

PB Ratio

NTR:

1.28

BIP-UN.TO:

5.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

NTR:

$27.76B

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$24.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NTR:

$8.66B

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$6.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

NTR:

$6.33B

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$11.14B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTR vs. BIP-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTR
NTR Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
NTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTR Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
NTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTR Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

BIP-UN.TO
BIP-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BIP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTR vs. BIP-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTRBIP-UN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.20

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

1.75

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.06

3.79

-1.74

NTR vs. BIP-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTR Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the BIP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTR and BIP-UN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTRBIP-UN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

1.15

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.45

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.90

-0.72

Drawdowns

NTR vs. BIP-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTR drawdown since its inception was -57.80%, which is greater than BIP-UN.TO's maximum drawdown of -51.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTR and BIP-UN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTRBIP-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.80%

-51.41%

-6.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.36%

-12.06%

-7.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.82%

-41.17%

+8.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.80%

-47.89%

-9.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.68%

-1.52%

-30.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.17%

-7.80%

-18.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.08%

5.55%

+2.53%

Volatility

NTR vs. BIP-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) at 4.78%. This indicates that NTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIP-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTRBIP-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.83%

4.78%

+2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.59%

14.26%

+11.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.67%

18.41%

+13.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.18%

33.34%

+0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.97%

38.92%

-4.95%

Dividends

NTR vs. BIP-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

NTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than BIP-UN.TO's 4.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIP-UN.TO
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P
4.51%5.04%4.85%5.00%4.23%3.97%5.61%5.62%6.65%5.64%5.16%10.13%
NTR
Nutrien Ltd.
3.25%3.53%4.83%3.76%3.51%2.45%3.74%3.67%3.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NTR vs. BIP-UN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nutrien Ltd. and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B20222023202420252026
5.96B
6.30B
(NTR) Total Revenue
(BIP-UN.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. NTR values in USD, BIP-UN.TO values in CAD

NTR vs. BIP-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nutrien Ltd. and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
27.2%
26.9%
Portfolio components
NTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.62B and revenue of 5.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.

BIP-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported a gross profit of 1.70B and revenue of 6.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.9%.

NTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported an operating income of 419.11M and revenue of 5.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.

BIP-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported an operating income of 1.59B and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.2%.

NTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported a net income of 129.19M and revenue of 5.96B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.

BIP-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported a net income of -86.00M and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in a net margin of -1.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NTR and BIP-UN.TO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTR and BIP-UN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer