NTNX vs. BOTZ
NTNX (Nutanix, Inc.) is a stock, while BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) is Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Over the past 5 years, NTNX returned 8.43%/yr vs 2.40%/yr for BOTZ. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NTNX vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTNX achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than BOTZ's 5.77% return.
NTNX
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- 12.72%
- YTD
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 9.41%
- 1Y
- -32.76%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- —
BOTZ
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -7.55%
- YTD
- 5.77%
- 6M
- 4.32%
- 1Y
- 22.87%
- 3Y*
- 10.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.40%
- 10Y*
- —
NTNX vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTNX Nutanix, Inc. | 0.31% | -15.51% | 28.29% | 83.07% | -18.24% | -0.03% | 1.95% | -24.84% | 17.89% | 32.83% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 5.77% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 38.97% | -42.69% | 8.65% | 51.92% | 31.80% | -28.34% | 58.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTNX and BOTZ is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2016 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NTNX and BOTZ has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTNX vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
NTNX
BOTZ
NTNX vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NTNX | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.17 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 1.19 | -1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | 4.04 | -4.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NTNX | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.71 | 0.93 | -1.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.09 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.42 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
NTNX vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTNX drawdown since its inception was -80.40%, which is greater than BOTZ's maximum drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTNX and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTNX | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.40% | -55.54% | -24.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.58% | -19.34% | -38.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.58% | -29.02% | -29.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.71% | -55.54% | -13.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.58% | -7.95% | -29.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.58% | -18.31% | -22.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.20% | 5.68% | +28.52% |
Volatility
NTNX vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) has a higher volatility of 16.50% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 9.09%. This indicates that NTNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTNX | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.50% | 9.09% | +7.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.80% | 18.83% | +16.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.19% | 24.62% | +21.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.73% | 26.83% | +22.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.17% | 25.77% | +31.40% |
Dividends
NTNX vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
NTNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.62% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
NTNX Nutanix, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NTNX and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NTNX has higher volatility (16.50%) compared to BOTZ (9.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTNX dropped -80.40% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.
BOTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTNX and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer