PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTNX vs. BE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NTNX vs. BE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) and Bloom Energy Corporation (BE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTNX achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than BE's 191.83% return.


NTNX

1D
-3.34%
1M
12.72%
YTD
0.31%
6M
9.41%
1Y
-32.76%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*

BE

1D
-3.81%
1M
-2.86%
YTD
191.83%
6M
126.83%
1Y
1,064.23%
3Y*
155.85%
5Y*
58.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTNX vs. BE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NTNX
Nutanix, Inc.
0.31%-15.51%28.29%83.07%-18.24%-0.03%1.95%-24.84%-23.62%
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
191.83%291.22%50.07%-22.59%-12.81%-23.48%283.67%-25.15%-60.08%

Correlation

The correlation between NTNX and BE is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018

0.28

Over the past year, the correlation between NTNX and BE has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NTNX:

$15.14B

BE:

$81.07B

EPS

NTNX:

$0.93

BE:

$0.02

PE Ratio

NTNX:

55.46

BE:

11.04K

PS Ratio

NTNX:

5.56

BE:

27.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

NTNX:

$2.75B

BE:

$2.45B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NTNX:

$2.39B

BE:

$761.91M

EBITDA (TTM)

NTNX:

$293.53M

BE:

$88.83M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTNX vs. BE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTNX
NTNX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
NTNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
NTNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

BE
BE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
BE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BE Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTNX vs. BE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) and Bloom Energy Corporation (BE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTNXBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-10.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.62

-0.73

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.57

23.42

-23.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.96

73.60

-74.56

NTNX vs. BE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTNX Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is lower than the BE Sharpe Ratio of 10.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTNX and BE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTNXBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.71

10.06

-10.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.69

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.36

-0.30

Drawdowns

NTNX vs. BE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTNX drawdown since its inception was -80.40%, smaller than the maximum BE drawdown of -92.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTNX and BE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTNXBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.40%

-92.54%

+12.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.58%

-45.94%

-11.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.58%

-53.42%

-5.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.71%

-75.87%

+7.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.58%

-17.64%

-19.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.58%

-52.00%

+11.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.20%

14.59%

+19.61%

Volatility

NTNX vs. BE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) is 16.50%, while Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) has a volatility of 26.19%. This indicates that NTNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTNXBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.50%

26.19%

-9.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.80%

75.40%

-39.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.19%

107.17%

-60.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.73%

85.83%

-36.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.17%

94.94%

-37.77%

Dividends

NTNX vs. BE - Dividend Comparison

Neither NTNX nor BE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

NTNX vs. BE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nutanix, Inc. and Bloom Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
703.07M
751.05M
(NTNX) Total Revenue
(BE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NTNX vs. BE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nutanix, Inc. and Bloom Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
86.9%
30.0%
Portfolio components
NTNX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutanix, Inc. reported a gross profit of 610.68M and revenue of 703.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.9%.

BE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 225.54M and revenue of 751.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.0%.

NTNX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutanix, Inc. reported an operating income of 68.56M and revenue of 703.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.

BE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 72.19M and revenue of 751.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.6%.

NTNX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutanix, Inc. reported a net income of 72.09M and revenue of 703.07M, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.

BE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a net income of 70.65M and revenue of 751.05M, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NTNX and BE have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BE has higher volatility (26.19%) compared to NTNX (16.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTNX dropped -80.40% vs BE's -92.54%.

BE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.06 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTNX and BE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer