NTES vs. YUMC
NTES (NetEase, Inc.) and YUMC (Yum China Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. NTES operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while YUMC operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, NTES returned 3.69%/yr vs -7.86%/yr for YUMC. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NTES vs. YUMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTES achieves a -12.37% return, which is significantly lower than YUMC's -10.25% return.
NTES
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 3.01%
- YTD
- -12.37%
- 6M
- -11.89%
- 1Y
- -4.27%
- 3Y*
- 11.57%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.95%
YUMC
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- -9.15%
- YTD
- -10.25%
- 6M
- -6.88%
- 1Y
- 0.49%
- 3Y*
- -9.20%
- 5Y*
- -7.86%
- 10Y*
- —
NTES vs. YUMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTES NetEase, Inc. | -12.37% | 58.28% | -1.73% | 30.59% | -27.35% | 7.11% | 57.88% | 34.66% | -31.31% | 62.21% |
YUMC Yum China Holdings, Inc. | -10.25% | 1.18% | 15.41% | -21.60% | 10.75% | -11.99% | 19.48% | 44.85% | -15.28% | 53.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTES and YUMC is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2016 | 0.35 |
The correlation between NTES and YUMC shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NTES:
$76.62B
YUMC:
$14.94B
NTES:
$52.95
YUMC:
$2.60
NTES:
2.24
YUMC:
16.25
NTES:
0.11
YUMC:
1.08
NTES:
0.67
YUMC:
1.27
NTES:
0.47
YUMC:
2.75
NTES:
$114.39B
YUMC:
$12.09B
NTES:
$75.14B
YUMC:
$1.47B
NTES:
$40.24B
YUMC:
$1.71B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTES vs. YUMC — Risk / Return Rank
NTES
YUMC
NTES vs. YUMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NetEase, Inc. (NTES) and Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NTES | YUMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.02 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 0.02 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | 0.05 | -0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NTES | YUMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 | 0.02 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | -0.21 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.18 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
NTES vs. YUMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTES drawdown since its inception was -96.41%, which is greater than YUMC's maximum drawdown of -56.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTES and YUMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTES | YUMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.41% | -56.49% | -39.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.46% | -26.06% | -4.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.97% | -51.42% | +17.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.38% | -56.45% | +5.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.01% | -34.37% | +10.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.59% | -19.36% | -5.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.99% | 10.35% | +6.64% |
Volatility
NTES vs. YUMC - Volatility Comparison
NetEase, Inc. (NTES) has a higher volatility of 9.07% compared to Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) at 5.08%. This indicates that NTES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YUMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTES | YUMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.07% | 5.08% | +3.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.57% | 18.77% | +1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.20% | 25.43% | +3.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.68% | 37.20% | +6.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.84% | 35.39% | +6.45% |
Dividends
NTES vs. YUMC - Dividend Comparison
NTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than YUMC's 2.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTES NetEase, Inc. | 2.54% | 2.21% | 2.74% | 1.88% | 2.10% | 0.80% | 0.97% | 3.19% | 0.71% | 1.05% | 1.36% | 0.98% |
YUMC Yum China Holdings, Inc. | 2.50% | 2.01% | 1.33% | 1.23% | 0.88% | 0.96% | 0.42% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
NTES vs. YUMC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NetEase, Inc. and Yum China Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NTES vs. YUMC - Profitability Comparison
NTES - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NetEase, Inc. reported a gross profit of 21.22B and revenue of 30.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.4%.
YUMC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NTES - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NetEase, Inc. reported an operating income of 12.66B and revenue of 30.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.4%.
YUMC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 447.00M and revenue of 3.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.7%.
NTES - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NetEase, Inc. reported a net income of 10.67B and revenue of 30.59B, resulting in a net margin of 34.9%.
YUMC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 309.00M and revenue of 3.27B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NTES and YUMC have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NTES has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to YUMC (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTES dropped -96.41% vs YUMC's -56.49%.
YUMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTES and YUMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer