PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTES vs. JD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NTES vs. JD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NetEase, Inc. (NTES) and JD.com, Inc. (JD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTES achieves a -12.37% return, which is significantly lower than JD's 3.17% return. Over the past 10 years, NTES has outperformed JD with an annualized return of 15.95%, while JD has yielded a comparatively lower 4.48% annualized return.


NTES

1D
-0.65%
1M
3.01%
YTD
-12.37%
6M
-11.89%
1Y
-4.27%
3Y*
11.57%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*
15.95%

JD

1D
-1.00%
1M
-5.11%
YTD
3.17%
6M
-1.04%
1Y
-10.60%
3Y*
-5.01%
5Y*
-14.79%
10Y*
4.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTES vs. JD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NTES
NetEase, Inc.
-12.37%58.28%-1.73%30.59%-27.35%7.11%57.88%34.66%-31.31%62.21%
JD
JD.com, Inc.
3.17%-14.78%23.45%-47.76%-17.87%-20.28%149.50%68.32%-49.47%62.81%

Correlation

The correlation between NTES and JD is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2014

0.52

The correlation between NTES and JD shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NTES:

$76.62B

JD:

$40.96B

EPS

NTES:

$52.95

JD:

$9.38

PE Ratio

NTES:

2.24

JD:

3.05

PEG Ratio

NTES:

0.11

JD:

0.15

PS Ratio

NTES:

0.67

JD:

0.03

PB Ratio

NTES:

0.47

JD:

0.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

NTES:

$114.39B

JD:

$1.32T

Gross Profit (TTM)

NTES:

$75.14B

JD:

$126.44B

EBITDA (TTM)

NTES:

$40.24B

JD:

$27.03B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTES vs. JD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTES
NTES Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
NTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTES Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
NTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTES Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

JD
JD Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
JD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
JD Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
JD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
JD Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTES vs. JD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NetEase, Inc. (NTES) and JD.com, Inc. (JD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTESJDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.97

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.14

-0.36

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.25

-0.71

+0.46

NTES vs. JD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTES Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is higher than the JD Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTES and JD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTESJDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

-0.33

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

-0.28

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.09

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.08

+0.35

Drawdowns

NTES vs. JD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTES drawdown since its inception was -96.41%, which is greater than JD's maximum drawdown of -79.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTES and JD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTESJDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.41%

-79.12%

-17.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.46%

-29.78%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.97%

-48.10%

+14.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.38%

-75.63%

+24.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.34%

-79.12%

+21.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.01%

-69.47%

+45.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.59%

-37.59%

+13.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.99%

14.91%

+2.08%

Volatility

NTES vs. JD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NetEase, Inc. (NTES) is 9.07%, while JD.com, Inc. (JD) has a volatility of 11.79%. This indicates that NTES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTESJDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.07%

11.79%

-2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.57%

22.61%

-2.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.20%

32.34%

-3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.68%

53.77%

-10.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.84%

47.79%

-5.95%

Dividends

NTES vs. JD - Dividend Comparison

NTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than JD's 3.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JD
JD.com, Inc.
3.50%3.48%2.19%2.15%2.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NTES
NetEase, Inc.
2.54%2.21%2.74%1.88%2.10%0.80%0.97%3.19%0.71%1.05%1.36%0.98%

Financials

NTES vs. JD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NetEase, Inc. and JD.com, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00B200.00B300.00B400.00B20222023202420252026
30.59B
313.78B
(NTES) Total Revenue
(JD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NTES vs. JD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NetEase, Inc. and JD.com, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
69.4%
16.7%
Portfolio components
NTES - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NetEase, Inc. reported a gross profit of 21.22B and revenue of 30.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.4%.

JD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JD.com, Inc. reported a gross profit of 52.43B and revenue of 313.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.7%.

NTES - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NetEase, Inc. reported an operating income of 12.66B and revenue of 30.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.4%.

JD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JD.com, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.78B and revenue of 313.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.2%.

NTES - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NetEase, Inc. reported a net income of 10.67B and revenue of 30.59B, resulting in a net margin of 34.9%.

JD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JD.com, Inc. reported a net income of 5.07B and revenue of 313.78B, resulting in a net margin of 1.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NTES and JD have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JD has higher volatility (11.79%) compared to NTES (9.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTES dropped -96.41% vs JD's -79.12%.

NTES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTES and JD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer