PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTES vs. HTHT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NTES vs. HTHT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NetEase, Inc. (NTES) and Huazhu Group Limited (HTHT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTES achieves a -12.37% return, which is significantly lower than HTHT's -3.71% return. Over the past 10 years, NTES has underperformed HTHT with an annualized return of 15.95%, while HTHT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.71% annualized return.


NTES

1D
-0.65%
1M
3.01%
YTD
-12.37%
6M
-11.89%
1Y
-4.27%
3Y*
11.57%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*
15.95%

HTHT

1D
-1.89%
1M
-6.22%
YTD
-3.71%
6M
-3.83%
1Y
31.87%
3Y*
5.24%
5Y*
-2.31%
10Y*
19.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTES vs. HTHT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NTES
NetEase, Inc.
-12.37%58.28%-1.73%30.59%-27.35%7.11%57.88%34.66%-31.31%62.21%
HTHT
Huazhu Group Limited
-3.71%50.26%0.96%-19.00%14.31%-17.08%13.28%39.96%-19.86%180.24%

Correlation

The correlation between NTES and HTHT is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2010

0.35

The correlation between NTES and HTHT shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NTES:

$76.62B

HTHT:

$14.44B

EPS

NTES:

$52.95

HTHT:

$15.32

PE Ratio

NTES:

2.24

HTHT:

2.88

PEG Ratio

NTES:

0.11

HTHT:

0.04

PS Ratio

NTES:

0.67

HTHT:

0.56

PB Ratio

NTES:

0.47

HTHT:

1.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

NTES:

$114.39B

HTHT:

$25.78B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NTES:

$75.14B

HTHT:

$10.45B

EBITDA (TTM)

NTES:

$40.24B

HTHT:

$8.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTES vs. HTHT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTES
NTES Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
NTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTES Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
NTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTES Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

HTHT
HTHT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
HTHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTHT Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
HTHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTHT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTES vs. HTHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NetEase, Inc. (NTES) and Huazhu Group Limited (HTHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTESHTHTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.19

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.14

1.52

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.25

4.54

-4.79

NTES vs. HTHT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTES Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the HTHT Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTES and HTHT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTESHTHTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

1.08

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

-0.05

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.40

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.39

+0.04

Drawdowns

NTES vs. HTHT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTES drawdown since its inception was -96.41%, which is greater than HTHT's maximum drawdown of -64.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTES and HTHT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTESHTHTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.41%

-64.02%

-32.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.46%

-21.05%

-9.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.97%

-41.05%

+7.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.38%

-60.87%

+9.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.34%

-64.02%

+6.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.01%

-19.18%

-4.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.59%

-25.80%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.99%

7.04%

+9.95%

Volatility

NTES vs. HTHT - Volatility Comparison

NetEase, Inc. (NTES) and Huazhu Group Limited (HTHT) have volatilities of 9.07% and 9.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTESHTHTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.07%

9.37%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.57%

22.22%

-1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.20%

29.80%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.68%

50.07%

-6.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.84%

48.97%

-7.13%

Dividends

NTES vs. HTHT - Dividend Comparison

NTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than HTHT's 4.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HTHT
Huazhu Group Limited
4.78%3.78%1.91%2.78%0.50%0.00%0.71%0.00%1.12%0.43%0.00%2.18%
NTES
NetEase, Inc.
2.54%2.21%2.74%1.88%2.10%0.80%0.97%3.19%0.71%1.05%1.36%0.98%

Financials

NTES vs. HTHT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NetEase, Inc. and Huazhu Group Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B20222023202420252026
30.59B
5.96B
(NTES) Total Revenue
(HTHT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NTES vs. HTHT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NetEase, Inc. and Huazhu Group Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
69.4%
38.8%
Portfolio components
NTES - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NetEase, Inc. reported a gross profit of 21.22B and revenue of 30.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.4%.

HTHT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huazhu Group Limited reported a gross profit of 2.31B and revenue of 5.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.8%.

NTES - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NetEase, Inc. reported an operating income of 12.66B and revenue of 30.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.4%.

HTHT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huazhu Group Limited reported an operating income of 1.49B and revenue of 5.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.9%.

NTES - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NetEase, Inc. reported a net income of 10.67B and revenue of 30.59B, resulting in a net margin of 34.9%.

HTHT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huazhu Group Limited reported a net income of 812.06M and revenue of 5.96B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NTES and HTHT have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HTHT has higher volatility (9.37%) compared to NTES (9.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTES dropped -96.41% vs HTHT's -64.02%.

HTHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTES and HTHT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer