PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOVN.SW vs. VWRL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOVN.SW vs. VWRL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CHF 10,000 investment in Novartis AG (NOVN.SW) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NOVN.SW is traded in CHF, while VWRL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VWRL.L values have been converted to CHF using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOVN.SW achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than VWRL.L's 10.05% return. Over the past 10 years, NOVN.SW has underperformed VWRL.L with an annualized return of 9.98%, while VWRL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.51% annualized return.


NOVN.SW

1D
2.04%
1M
2.19%
YTD
8.91%
6M
11.93%
1Y
22.96%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
9.98%

VWRL.L

1D
0.14%
1M
3.01%
YTD
10.05%
6M
9.47%
1Y
22.09%
3Y*
15.21%
5Y*
8.24%
10Y*
10.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOVN.SW vs. VWRL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOVN.SW
Novartis AG
8.91%27.98%8.44%11.93%8.75%-0.11%-5.39%28.50%6.51%16.04%
VWRL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing
10.05%7.11%26.88%10.81%-17.10%22.46%5.82%24.78%-9.23%18.72%

Correlation

The correlation between NOVN.SW and VWRL.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2012

0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between NOVN.SW and VWRL.L has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOVN.SW vs. VWRL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOVN.SW
NOVN.SW Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NOVN.SW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOVN.SW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOVN.SW Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
NOVN.SW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOVN.SW Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

VWRL.L
VWRL.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VWRL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOVN.SW vs. VWRL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novartis AG (NOVN.SW) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOVN.SWVWRL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.34

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

2.92

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.53

10.01

-4.48

NOVN.SW vs. VWRL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOVN.SW Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the VWRL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOVN.SW and VWRL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOVN.SWVWRL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

1.89

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.56

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.66

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.63

-0.15

Drawdowns

NOVN.SW vs. VWRL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOVN.SW drawdown since its inception was -42.25%, which is greater than VWRL.L's maximum drawdown of -32.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOVN.SW and VWRL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOVN.SWVWRL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.25%

-32.93%

-9.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.78%

-7.53%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.86%

-20.21%

+3.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.86%

-21.44%

+4.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.11%

-32.93%

+8.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.53%

-1.43%

-7.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.40%

-4.93%

-6.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.43%

2.20%

+2.23%

Volatility

NOVN.SW vs. VWRL.L - Volatility Comparison

Novartis AG (NOVN.SW) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) at 2.93%. This indicates that NOVN.SW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOVN.SWVWRL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

2.93%

+3.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.12%

8.33%

+4.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.53%

11.69%

+6.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.81%

14.79%

+3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.23%

15.83%

+2.40%

Dividends

NOVN.SW vs. VWRL.L - Dividend Comparison

NOVN.SW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than VWRL.L's 1.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOVN.SW
Novartis AG
3.19%3.19%3.72%3.77%3.91%3.94%3.72%3.27%3.98%3.98%4.35%3.58%
VWRL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing
1.26%1.39%1.49%1.72%2.03%1.45%1.58%1.95%2.22%1.90%1.95%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOVN.SW and VWRL.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOVN.SW and VWRL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer