PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOVN.SW vs. CAH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NOVN.SW vs. CAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CHF 10,000 investment in Novartis AG (NOVN.SW) and Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NOVN.SW is traded in CHF, while CAH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CAH values have been converted to CHF using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOVN.SW achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly higher than CAH's 0.88% return. Over the past 10 years, NOVN.SW has underperformed CAH with an annualized return of 9.98%, while CAH has yielded a comparatively higher 11.11% annualized return.


NOVN.SW

1D
2.04%
1M
2.19%
YTD
8.91%
6M
11.47%
1Y
22.96%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
9.98%

CAH

1D
0.00%
1M
14.87%
YTD
0.88%
6M
2.49%
1Y
30.17%
3Y*
29.94%
5Y*
28.48%
10Y*
11.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOVN.SW vs. CAH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOVN.SW
Novartis AG
8.91%27.98%8.44%11.93%8.75%-0.11%-5.39%28.50%6.51%16.04%
CAH
Cardinal Health, Inc.
0.88%54.00%28.39%22.14%56.19%2.54%0.81%16.04%-23.77%-16.36%

Correlation

The correlation between NOVN.SW and CAH is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2007

0.30

The correlation between NOVN.SW and CAH shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (3 years) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOVN.SW vs. CAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOVN.SW
NOVN.SW Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NOVN.SW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOVN.SW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOVN.SW Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
NOVN.SW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOVN.SW Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

CAH
CAH Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAH Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
CAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAH Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOVN.SW vs. CAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novartis AG (NOVN.SW) and Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOVN.SWCAHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.22

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

1.48

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.53

3.88

+1.65

NOVN.SW vs. CAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOVN.SW Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the CAH Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOVN.SW and CAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOVN.SWCAHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

0.97

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

1.09

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.37

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.27

+0.21

Drawdowns

NOVN.SW vs. CAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOVN.SW drawdown since its inception was -42.25%, smaller than the maximum CAH drawdown of -60.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOVN.SW and CAH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOVN.SWCAHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.25%

-60.69%

+18.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.78%

-20.51%

+9.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.86%

-20.51%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.86%

-21.75%

+4.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.11%

-47.13%

+23.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.53%

-8.38%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.40%

-23.36%

+11.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.43%

7.80%

-3.37%

Volatility

NOVN.SW vs. CAH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Novartis AG (NOVN.SW) is 6.01%, while Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) has a volatility of 6.94%. This indicates that NOVN.SW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOVN.SWCAHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

6.94%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.12%

20.86%

-7.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.53%

31.42%

-12.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.81%

26.32%

-8.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.23%

30.41%

-12.18%

Dividends

NOVN.SW vs. CAH - Dividend Comparison

NOVN.SW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than CAH's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAH
Cardinal Health, Inc.
1.00%0.99%1.28%1.98%2.57%3.80%3.62%3.80%4.24%3.00%2.41%1.68%
NOVN.SW
Novartis AG
3.19%3.19%3.72%3.77%3.91%3.94%3.72%3.27%3.98%3.98%4.35%3.58%

Financials

NOVN.SW vs. CAH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Novartis AG and Cardinal Health, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. NOVN.SW values in CHF, CAH values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


NOVN.SW and CAH have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOVN.SW and CAH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer