NOMD vs. CDNS
NOMD (Nomad Foods Limited) and CDNS (Cadence Design Systems, Inc.) are both stocks. NOMD operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while CDNS operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 10 years, NOMD returned 1.42%/yr vs 31.92%/yr for CDNS. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NOMD vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOMD achieves a -18.10% return, which is significantly lower than CDNS's 26.12% return. Over the past 10 years, NOMD has underperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 1.42%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively higher 31.92% annualized return.
NOMD
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 7.11%
- YTD
- -18.10%
- 6M
- -14.41%
- 1Y
- -38.37%
- 3Y*
- -14.69%
- 5Y*
- -18.66%
- 10Y*
- 1.42%
CDNS
- 1D
- 4.80%
- 1M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- 26.12%
- 6M
- 16.88%
- 1Y
- 32.76%
- 3Y*
- 19.80%
- 5Y*
- 25.79%
- 10Y*
- 31.92%
NOMD vs. CDNS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOMD Nomad Foods Limited | -18.10% | -22.15% | 2.39% | -1.68% | -32.10% | -0.12% | 13.63% | 33.79% | -1.12% | 76.70% |
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 26.12% | 4.03% | 10.31% | 69.55% | -13.80% | 36.59% | 96.70% | 59.52% | 3.97% | 65.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOMD and CDNS is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016 | 0.17 |
The correlation between NOMD and CDNS shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (3 years) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NOMD:
$1.41B
CDNS:
$107.91B
NOMD:
$0.91
CDNS:
$4.28
NOMD:
10.93
CDNS:
92.03
NOMD:
17.64
CDNS:
7.02
NOMD:
0.49
CDNS:
19.49
NOMD:
0.56
CDNS:
12.37
NOMD:
$3.00B
CDNS:
$5.53B
NOMD:
$798.02M
CDNS:
$4.91B
NOMD:
$343.69M
CDNS:
$1.87B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOMD vs. CDNS — Risk / Return Rank
NOMD
CDNS
NOMD vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NOMD | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.18 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 1.14 | -1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | 2.42 | -3.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NOMD | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.23 | 0.85 | -2.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.64 | 0.72 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 | 0.94 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.24 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
NOMD vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOMD drawdown since its inception was -67.99%, smaller than the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOMD and CDNS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOMD | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.99% | -93.13% | +25.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.12% | -28.85% | -18.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.77% | -29.05% | -23.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.57% | -29.59% | -37.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.99% | -32.12% | -35.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.03% | -5.32% | -59.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.28% | -39.64% | +14.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.28% | 13.60% | +17.68% |
Volatility
NOMD vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is 12.85%, while Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) has a volatility of 16.58%. This indicates that NOMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOMD | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.85% | 16.58% | -3.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.46% | 31.69% | -7.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.31% | 39.02% | -7.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.25% | 36.20% | -6.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.72% | 34.13% | -5.41% |
Dividends
NOMD vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison
NOMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.85%, while CDNS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NOMD Nomad Foods Limited | 6.85% | 5.44% | 3.58% |
Financials
NOMD vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nomad Foods Limited and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NOMD vs. CDNS - Profitability Comparison
NOMD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nomad Foods Limited reported a gross profit of 186.62M and revenue of 726.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.7%.
CDNS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.41B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.9%.
NOMD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nomad Foods Limited reported an operating income of 67.70M and revenue of 726.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.3%.
CDNS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 431.33M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.3%.
NOMD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nomad Foods Limited reported a net income of 29.38M and revenue of 726.96M, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.
CDNS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 335.66M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 22.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NOMD and CDNS have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CDNS has higher volatility (16.58%) compared to NOMD (12.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOMD dropped -67.99% vs CDNS's -93.13%.
CDNS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NOMD and CDNS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer