PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMFC vs. TSLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NMFC vs. TSLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC) and Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. (TSLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMFC achieves a -11.79% return, which is significantly higher than TSLX's -18.90% return. Over the past 10 years, NMFC has underperformed TSLX with an annualized return of 6.08%, while TSLX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.45% annualized return.


NMFC

1D
-0.51%
1M
-5.92%
YTD
-11.79%
6M
-13.53%
1Y
-16.84%
3Y*
-3.49%
5Y*
-0.05%
10Y*
6.08%

TSLX

1D
-1.38%
1M
-4.40%
YTD
-18.90%
6M
-19.48%
1Y
-19.78%
3Y*
6.57%
5Y*
4.47%
10Y*
11.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMFC vs. TSLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMFC
New Mountain Finance Corporation
-11.79%-7.17%-0.95%15.47%-0.55%31.94%-7.13%20.64%2.78%5.71%
TSLX
Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.
-18.90%11.52%8.83%35.29%-16.37%32.33%9.77%29.62%0.36%15.47%

Correlation

The correlation between NMFC and TSLX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2014

0.54

The correlation between NMFC and TSLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

NMFC:

$328.53

TSLX:

$436.19

PE Ratio

NMFC:

0.02

TSLX:

0.04

PS Ratio

NMFC:

2.30

TSLX:

0.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

NMFC:

$315.55M

TSLX:

$91.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NMFC:

$203.95M

TSLX:

$215.15M

EBITDA (TTM)

NMFC:

$106.53M

TSLX:

$192.45M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMFC vs. TSLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMFC
NMFC Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
NMFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMFC Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
NMFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMFC Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLX
TSLX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TSLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMFC vs. TSLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC) and Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. (TSLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NMFCTSLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

0.87

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.69

-0.71

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.35

-1.35

0.00

NMFC vs. TSLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMFC Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is comparable to the TSLX Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMFC and TSLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NMFCTSLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.75

-0.81

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

0.23

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.54

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.51

-0.20

Drawdowns

NMFC vs. TSLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMFC drawdown since its inception was -64.16%, which is greater than TSLX's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMFC and TSLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMFCTSLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.16%

-50.27%

-13.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.56%

-27.94%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.77%

-27.94%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.77%

-28.77%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.16%

-50.27%

-13.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.29%

-26.75%

+3.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-9.08%

+3.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.48%

14.69%

-2.21%

Volatility

NMFC vs. TSLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC) is 6.73%, while Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc. (TSLX) has a volatility of 8.58%. This indicates that NMFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMFCTSLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.73%

8.58%

-1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.23%

20.68%

-2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.67%

24.64%

-1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.54%

19.40%

-0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.91%

21.47%

+4.44%

Dividends

NMFC vs. TSLX - Dividend Comparison

NMFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.43%, more than TSLX's 11.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMFC
New Mountain Finance Corporation
16.43%13.90%12.17%11.40%9.86%8.76%10.92%9.90%10.81%10.04%9.65%10.45%
TSLX
Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.
11.25%9.44%9.81%9.72%10.34%15.35%11.08%8.43%9.84%8.84%8.35%9.62%

Financials

NMFC vs. TSLX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between New Mountain Finance Corporation and Sixth Street Specialty Lending, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B20222023202420252026
68.79M
91.19B
(NMFC) Total Revenue
(TSLX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NMFC and TSLX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLX has higher volatility (8.58%) compared to NMFC (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMFC dropped -64.16% vs TSLX's -50.27%.

NMFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.75 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMFC and TSLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer