NLY vs. ENFR
NLY (Annaly Capital Management, Inc.) is a stock, while ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Over the past 10 years, NLY returned 5.29%/yr vs 11.99%/yr for ENFR. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NLY vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NLY achieves a -3.07% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 24.34% return. Over the past 10 years, NLY has underperformed ENFR with an annualized return of 5.29%, while ENFR has yielded a comparatively higher 11.99% annualized return.
NLY
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -7.30%
- YTD
- -3.07%
- 6M
- -1.18%
- 1Y
- 25.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.16%
- 5Y*
- 1.37%
- 10Y*
- 5.29%
ENFR
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- YTD
- 24.34%
- 6M
- 23.38%
- 1Y
- 25.73%
- 3Y*
- 27.67%
- 5Y*
- 19.49%
- 10Y*
- 11.99%
NLY vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLY Annaly Capital Management, Inc. | -3.07% | 40.00% | 8.07% | 4.94% | -21.41% | 2.48% | 2.38% | 7.22% | -7.22% | 31.92% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 24.34% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | 17.48% | 39.97% | -24.14% | 21.60% | -18.67% | -0.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between NLY and ENFR is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013 | 0.36 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NLY and ENFR has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NLY vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
NLY
ENFR
NLY vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NLY | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.30 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 2.99 | -1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.22 | 8.07 | -2.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NLY | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 1.77 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 1.02 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.49 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.34 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
NLY vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NLY drawdown since its inception was -60.09%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLY and ENFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NLY | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.09% | -68.28% | +8.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.88% | -8.64% | -6.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.70% | -15.58% | -11.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.97% | -20.29% | -31.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.09% | -62.64% | +2.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.17% | -5.15% | -6.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.75% | -15.97% | +2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.97% | 3.20% | +1.77% |
Volatility
NLY vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) is 3.97%, while Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that NLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NLY | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 5.78% | -1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.66% | 11.41% | +3.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.56% | 14.64% | +3.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.54% | 19.29% | +6.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.12% | 24.68% | +3.44% |
Dividends
NLY vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
NLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.36%, more than ENFR's 4.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.03% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
NLY Annaly Capital Management, Inc. | 13.36% | 12.52% | 14.21% | 13.42% | 16.70% | 11.25% | 10.77% | 11.15% | 12.22% | 10.09% | 12.04% | 12.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NLY and ENFR have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENFR has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to NLY (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLY dropped -60.09% vs ENFR's -68.28%.
ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NLY and ENFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer