PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NLY vs. C
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NLY vs. C - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) and Citigroup Inc. (C). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLY achieves a -3.07% return, which is significantly lower than C's 15.36% return. Over the past 10 years, NLY has underperformed C with an annualized return of 5.29%, while C has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.


NLY

1D
-1.23%
1M
-7.30%
YTD
-3.07%
6M
-1.18%
1Y
25.88%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
1.37%
10Y*
5.29%

C

1D
0.61%
1M
6.16%
YTD
15.36%
6M
23.58%
1Y
74.17%
3Y*
44.93%
5Y*
15.19%
10Y*
15.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NLY vs. C - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NLY
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
-3.07%40.00%8.07%4.94%-21.41%2.48%2.38%7.22%-7.22%31.92%
C
Citigroup Inc.
15.36%70.38%41.93%18.98%-22.09%0.93%-19.70%57.82%-28.49%27.03%

Correlation

The correlation between NLY and C is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 1997

0.27

The correlation between NLY and C shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NLY:

$15.18B

C:

$236.71B

EPS

NLY:

$3.28

C:

$8.65

PE Ratio

NLY:

6.38

C:

15.41

PS Ratio

NLY:

2.68

C:

1.44

PB Ratio

NLY:

1.05

C:

1.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

NLY:

$5.21B

C:

$171.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NLY:

$5.17B

C:

$77.85B

EBITDA (TTM)

NLY:

$5.65B

C:

$24.12B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NLY vs. C — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NLY
NLY Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLY Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
NLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLY Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

C
C Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
C Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
C Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
C Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
C Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NLY vs. C - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) and Citigroup Inc. (C). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NLYCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.42

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

5.05

-3.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.22

14.54

-9.33

NLY vs. C - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLY Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the C Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLY and C, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NLYCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

2.65

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.52

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.46

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.15

+0.15

Drawdowns

NLY vs. C - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLY drawdown since its inception was -60.09%, smaller than the maximum C drawdown of -98.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLY and C.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NLYCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.09%

-98.00%

+37.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.88%

-14.76%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.70%

-31.31%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.97%

-45.78%

-6.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.09%

-56.51%

-3.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.17%

-64.43%

+53.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.75%

-43.51%

+29.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.97%

5.12%

-0.15%

Volatility

NLY vs. C - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) is 3.97%, while Citigroup Inc. (C) has a volatility of 8.43%. This indicates that NLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than C based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NLYCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

8.43%

-4.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.66%

22.84%

-8.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.56%

28.19%

-9.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.54%

29.18%

-3.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.12%

33.23%

-5.11%

Dividends

NLY vs. C - Dividend Comparison

NLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.36%, more than C's 1.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
C
Citigroup Inc.
1.80%1.99%3.10%4.04%4.51%3.38%3.31%2.40%2.96%1.29%0.71%0.31%
NLY
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
13.36%12.52%14.21%13.42%16.70%11.25%10.77%11.15%12.22%10.09%12.04%12.79%

Financials

NLY vs. C - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Annaly Capital Management, Inc. and Citigroup Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B202220232024202520260
44.14B
(NLY) Total Revenue
(C) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NLY and C have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

C has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to NLY (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLY dropped -60.09% vs C's -98.00%.

C currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NLY and C

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer