NICE vs. MBLY
NICE (NICE Ltd.) and MBLY (Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock) are both stocks. NICE operates in Software - Application (Technology), while MBLY operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 3 years, NICE returned -24.93%/yr vs -38.56%/yr for MBLY. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NICE vs. MBLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NICE achieves a -19.19% return, which is significantly lower than MBLY's -7.18% return.
NICE
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- -19.19%
- 6M
- -13.59%
- 1Y
- -48.30%
- 3Y*
- -24.93%
- 5Y*
- -16.72%
- 10Y*
- 4.08%
MBLY
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- 5.44%
- YTD
- -7.18%
- 6M
- -14.32%
- 1Y
- -42.59%
- 3Y*
- -38.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NICE vs. MBLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NICE NICE Ltd. | -19.19% | -33.44% | -14.87% | 3.75% | -0.93% |
MBLY Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock | -7.18% | -47.59% | -54.02% | 23.56% | 21.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between NICE and MBLY is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2022 | 0.34 |
Fundamentals
NICE:
$5.54B
MBLY:
$7.92B
NICE:
$8.49
MBLY:
-$5.07
NICE:
1.89
MBLY:
3.90
NICE:
1.51
MBLY:
0.97
NICE:
$3.01B
MBLY:
$2.01B
NICE:
$1.98B
MBLY:
$972.00M
NICE:
$841.27M
MBLY:
-$3.79B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NICE vs. MBLY — Risk / Return Rank
NICE
MBLY
NICE vs. MBLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NICE Ltd. (NICE) and Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock (MBLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NICE | MBLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 0.87 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | -0.65 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | -1.04 | -0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NICE | MBLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.95 | -0.82 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | -0.44 | +0.67 |
Drawdowns
NICE vs. MBLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NICE drawdown since its inception was -93.23%, which is greater than MBLY's maximum drawdown of -86.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NICE and MBLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NICE | MBLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.23% | -86.05% | -7.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.56% | -65.62% | +14.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.98% | -85.21% | +18.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.00% | -79.39% | +8.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.17% | -47.22% | +12.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.15% | 40.92% | -8.77% |
Volatility
NICE vs. MBLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NICE Ltd. (NICE) is 12.47%, while Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock (MBLY) has a volatility of 21.03%. This indicates that NICE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MBLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NICE | MBLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.47% | 21.03% | -8.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.62% | 39.23% | +2.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.86% | 52.10% | -1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.81% | 60.41% | -20.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.23% | 60.41% | -27.18% |
Dividends
NICE vs. MBLY - Dividend Comparison
Neither NICE nor MBLY has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBLY Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NICE NICE Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.76% | 0.91% |
Financials
NICE vs. MBLY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NICE Ltd. and Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NICE and MBLY have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MBLY has higher volatility (21.03%) compared to NICE (12.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NICE dropped -93.23% vs MBLY's -86.05%.
MBLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.82 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NICE and MBLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer