PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NICE vs. MBLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NICE vs. MBLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NICE Ltd. (NICE) and Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock (MBLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NICE achieves a -19.19% return, which is significantly lower than MBLY's -7.18% return.


NICE

1D
-1.92%
1M
-1.49%
YTD
-19.19%
6M
-13.59%
1Y
-48.30%
3Y*
-24.93%
5Y*
-16.72%
10Y*
4.08%

MBLY

1D
2.32%
1M
5.44%
YTD
-7.18%
6M
-14.32%
1Y
-42.59%
3Y*
-38.56%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NICE vs. MBLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NICE
NICE Ltd.
-19.19%-33.44%-14.87%3.75%-0.93%
MBLY
Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock
-7.18%-47.59%-54.02%23.56%21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between NICE and MBLY is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2022

0.34

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NICE:

$5.54B

MBLY:

$7.92B

EPS

NICE:

$8.49

MBLY:

-$5.07

PS Ratio

NICE:

1.89

MBLY:

3.90

PB Ratio

NICE:

1.51

MBLY:

0.97

Total Revenue (TTM)

NICE:

$3.01B

MBLY:

$2.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NICE:

$1.98B

MBLY:

$972.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

NICE:

$841.27M

MBLY:

-$3.79B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NICE vs. MBLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NICE
NICE Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
NICE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NICE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
NICE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
NICE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
NICE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

MBLY
MBLY Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MBLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBLY Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
MBLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBLY Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NICE vs. MBLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NICE Ltd. (NICE) and Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock (MBLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NICEMBLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

0.87

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

-0.65

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.50

-1.04

-0.46

NICE vs. MBLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NICE Sharpe Ratio is -0.95, which is comparable to the MBLY Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NICE and MBLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NICEMBLYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.95

-0.82

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

-0.44

+0.67

Drawdowns

NICE vs. MBLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NICE drawdown since its inception was -93.23%, which is greater than MBLY's maximum drawdown of -86.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NICE and MBLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NICEMBLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.23%

-86.05%

-7.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.56%

-65.62%

+14.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.98%

-85.21%

+18.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.00%

-79.39%

+8.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.17%

-47.22%

+12.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.15%

40.92%

-8.77%

Volatility

NICE vs. MBLY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NICE Ltd. (NICE) is 12.47%, while Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock (MBLY) has a volatility of 21.03%. This indicates that NICE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MBLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NICEMBLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.47%

21.03%

-8.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.62%

39.23%

+2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.86%

52.10%

-1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.81%

60.41%

-20.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.23%

60.41%

-27.18%

Dividends

NICE vs. MBLY - Dividend Comparison

Neither NICE nor MBLY has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MBLY
Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NICE
NICE Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.14%0.76%0.91%

Financials

NICE vs. MBLY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NICE Ltd. and Mobileye Global Inc. Class A Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
766.53M
558.00M
(NICE) Total Revenue
(MBLY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NICE and MBLY have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MBLY has higher volatility (21.03%) compared to NICE (12.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NICE dropped -93.23% vs MBLY's -86.05%.

MBLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.82 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NICE and MBLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer