PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NICE vs. CYBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NICE vs. CYBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NICE Ltd. (NICE) and CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NICE

1D
-1.92%
1M
-1.49%
YTD
-19.19%
6M
-13.59%
1Y
-48.30%
3Y*
-24.93%
5Y*
-16.72%
10Y*
4.08%

CYBR

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NICE vs. CYBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NICE
NICE Ltd.
-19.19%-33.44%-14.87%3.75%-36.66%7.07%82.75%43.38%17.73%33.92%
CYBR
CyberArk Software Ltd.
-8.34%33.89%52.09%68.95%-25.18%7.23%38.61%57.24%79.13%-9.03%

Correlation

The correlation between NICE and CYBR is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2014

0.39

The correlation between NICE and CYBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NICE:

$5.54B

CYBR:

$20.69B

EPS

NICE:

$8.49

CYBR:

-$2.92

PS Ratio

NICE:

1.89

CYBR:

15.13

PB Ratio

NICE:

1.51

CYBR:

8.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

NICE:

$3.01B

CYBR:

$1.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NICE:

$1.98B

CYBR:

$1.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

NICE:

$841.27M

CYBR:

$59.13M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NICE vs. CYBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NICE
NICE Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
NICE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NICE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
NICE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
NICE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
NICE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

CYBR
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NICE vs. CYBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NICE Ltd. (NICE) and CyberArk Software Ltd. (CYBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NICECYBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.50

NICE vs. CYBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NICECYBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

Drawdowns

NICE vs. CYBR - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NICECYBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.15%

Volatility

NICE vs. CYBR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NICECYBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.23%

Dividends

NICE vs. CYBR - Dividend Comparison

Neither NICE nor CYBR has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CYBR
CyberArk Software Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NICE
NICE Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.14%0.76%0.91%

Financials

NICE vs. CYBR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NICE Ltd. and CyberArk Software Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
766.53M
372.65M
(NICE) Total Revenue
(CYBR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NICE vs. CYBR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NICE Ltd. and CyberArk Software Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
64.4%
71.7%
Portfolio components
NICE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NICE Ltd. reported a gross profit of 493.46M and revenue of 766.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.4%.

CYBR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported a gross profit of 267.25M and revenue of 372.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.7%.

NICE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NICE Ltd. reported an operating income of 126.41M and revenue of 766.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.

CYBR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported an operating income of 1.75M and revenue of 372.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.5%.

NICE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NICE Ltd. reported a net income of 46.69M and revenue of 766.53M, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.

CYBR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CyberArk Software Ltd. reported a net income of -17.11M and revenue of 372.65M, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NICE and CYBR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NICE and CYBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer