PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NHC vs. SEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NHC vs. SEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in National HealthCare Corporation (NHC) and Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NHC achieves a 37.48% return, which is significantly higher than SEM's 12.48% return. Over the past 10 years, NHC has outperformed SEM with an annualized return of 14.72%, while SEM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.09% annualized return.


NHC

1D
-2.29%
1M
-0.58%
YTD
37.48%
6M
43.22%
1Y
80.47%
3Y*
48.50%
5Y*
24.04%
10Y*
14.72%

SEM

1D
0.18%
1M
1.36%
YTD
12.48%
6M
12.02%
1Y
9.24%
3Y*
4.38%
5Y*
-3.65%
10Y*
11.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NHC vs. SEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NHC
National HealthCare Corporation
37.48%30.34%19.05%60.84%-9.42%5.39%-20.66%13.02%32.43%-17.26%
SEM
Select Medical Holdings Corporation
12.48%-19.84%51.24%-3.52%-13.85%7.41%18.51%52.05%-13.03%33.21%

Correlation

The correlation between NHC and SEM is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2009

0.39

Fundamentals

EPS

NHC:

$7.89

SEM:

$1.44

PE Ratio

NHC:

23.79

SEM:

11.49

PS Ratio

NHC:

1.95

SEM:

0.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

NHC:

$1.51B

SEM:

$5.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NHC:

$558.31M

SEM:

$588.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

NHC:

$204.52M

SEM:

$442.21M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NHC vs. SEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NHC
NHC Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
NHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
NHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHC Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

SEM
SEM Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NHC vs. SEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National HealthCare Corporation (NHC) and Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NHCSEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.11

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.16

0.39

+5.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.45

0.98

+15.46

NHC vs. SEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NHC Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the SEM Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NHC and SEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NHCSEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

0.30

+2.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

-0.10

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.26

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.22

+0.03

Drawdowns

NHC vs. SEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NHC drawdown since its inception was -96.33%, which is greater than SEM's maximum drawdown of -60.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHC and SEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NHCSEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.33%

-60.26%

-36.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.13%

-24.02%

+10.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.40%

-45.04%

+11.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.40%

-49.09%

+15.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

-60.26%

+24.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.90%

-22.10%

+16.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.42%

-22.66%

-3.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.92%

9.40%

-4.48%

Volatility

NHC vs. SEM - Volatility Comparison

National HealthCare Corporation (NHC) has a higher volatility of 13.13% compared to Select Medical Holdings Corporation (SEM) at 0.69%. This indicates that NHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NHCSEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.13%

0.69%

+12.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.60%

13.47%

+12.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.13%

31.38%

+0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.74%

37.44%

-9.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.21%

42.30%

-14.09%

Dividends

NHC vs. SEM - Dividend Comparison

NHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than SEM's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NHC
National HealthCare Corporation
1.36%1.85%2.25%2.53%3.80%3.11%3.13%2.38%2.52%3.10%2.31%3.14%
SEM
Select Medical Holdings Corporation
1.51%1.68%97.39%2.13%2.01%1.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.84%

Financials

NHC vs. SEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between National HealthCare Corporation and Select Medical Holdings Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
369.81M
1.42B
(NHC) Total Revenue
(SEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NHC vs. SEM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between National HealthCare Corporation and Select Medical Holdings Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%202220232024202520260
12.3%
Portfolio components
NHC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National HealthCare Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 369.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SEM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Select Medical Holdings Corporation reported a gross profit of 175.47M and revenue of 1.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.3%.

NHC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National HealthCare Corporation reported an operating income of 32.25M and revenue of 369.81M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.7%.

SEM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Select Medical Holdings Corporation reported an operating income of 98.42M and revenue of 1.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.9%.

NHC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National HealthCare Corporation reported a net income of 35.86M and revenue of 369.81M, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.

SEM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Select Medical Holdings Corporation reported a net income of 44.00M and revenue of 1.42B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NHC and SEM have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NHC has higher volatility (13.13%) compared to SEM (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NHC dropped -96.33% vs SEM's -60.26%.

NHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NHC and SEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer