NFLX.NEO vs. GTX

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

NFLX.NEO (Netflix Inc CDR) and GTX (Garrett Motion Inc.) are both stocks. NFLX.NEO operates in Entertainment (Communication Services), while GTX operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 3 years, NFLX.NEO returned 22.99%/yr vs 65.18%/yr for GTX. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NFLX.NEO vs. GTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Netflix Inc CDR (NFLX.NEO) and Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

NFLX.NEO is traded in CAD, while GTX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GTX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLX.NEO achieves a -12.57% return, which is significantly lower than GTX's 89.61% return.

NFLX.NEO

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: -5.45%
• YTD: -12.57%
• 6M: -15.41%
• 1Y: -34.86%
• 3Y*: 22.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GTX

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: 13.79%
• YTD: 89.61%
• 6M: 98.75%
• 1Y: 228.08%
• 3Y*: 65.18%
• 5Y*: 37.28%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLX.NEO vs. GTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
NFLX.NEO Netflix Inc CDR	-12.57%	2.50%	80.06%	62.83%	-51.84%	9.73%
GTX Garrett Motion Inc.	89.61%	88.23%	1.29%	23.88%	0.91%	9.61%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLX.NEO and GTX is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2021	0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap NFLX.NEO : CA$132.37B GTX : $6.23B
EPS NFLX.NEO : CA$2.46 GTX : $1.72
PE Ratio NFLX.NEO : 12.71 GTX : 18.76
PS Ratio NFLX.NEO : 3.06 GTX : 2.38
Total Revenue (TTM) NFLX.NEO : CA$43.38B GTX : $2.71B
Gross Profit (TTM) NFLX.NEO : CA$20.86B GTX : $855.00M

Return for Risk

NFLX.NEO vs. GTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLX.NEO

NFLX.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 8
NFLX.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
NFLX.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
NFLX.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6
NFLX.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
NFLX.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 10

GTX

GTX Risk / Return Rank: 98
GTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
GTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
GTX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
GTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
GTX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLX.NEO vs. GTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Netflix Inc CDR (NFLX.NEO) and Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NFLX.NEO	GTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.05	4.78	-5.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.48	6.61	-8.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	1.79	-0.98
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.79	12.00	-12.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.36	38.48	-39.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NFLX.NEO vs. GTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLX.NEO Sharpe Ratio is -1.05, which is lower than the GTX Sharpe Ratio of 4.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLX.NEO and GTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NFLX.NEO	GTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.05	4.78	-5.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.10	+0.06

Drawdowns

NFLX.NEO vs. GTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLX.NEO drawdown since its inception was -76.06%, smaller than the maximum GTX drawdown of -93.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLX.NEO and GTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFLX.NEO	GTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.06%	-93.75%	+17.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.25%	-19.14%	-25.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-44.25%	-27.66%	-16.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.53%	-3.67%	-35.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.56%	-55.31%	+25.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.61%	5.96%	+19.65%

Volatility

NFLX.NEO vs. GTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Netflix Inc CDR (NFLX.NEO) is 6.67%, while Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) has a volatility of 14.79%. This indicates that NFLX.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NFLX.NEO	GTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.67%	14.79%	-8.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.45%	35.16%	-9.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.48%	48.11%	-14.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.08%	41.92%	+2.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.08%	64.08%	-20.00%

Dividends

NFLX.NEO vs. GTX - Dividend Comparison

NFLX.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.

Position	TTM	2025
GTX Garrett Motion Inc.	0.93%	1.49%
NFLX.NEO Netflix Inc CDR	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFLX.NEO and GTX in my portfolio?

NFLX.NEO and GTX have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.