PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEOV vs. LW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NEOV vs. LW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock (NEOV) and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEOV achieves a -35.20% return, which is significantly lower than LW's 3.41% return.


NEOV

1D
0.51%
1M
-25.38%
YTD
-35.20%
6M
-43.39%
1Y
-35.62%
3Y*
-13.27%
5Y*
-22.17%
10Y*

LW

1D
1.09%
1M
1.36%
YTD
3.41%
6M
-27.23%
1Y
-21.23%
3Y*
-26.27%
5Y*
-10.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEOV vs. LW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NEOV
NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock
-35.20%-41.65%225.62%-42.65%-60.20%60.78%237.98%
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
3.41%-35.69%-37.01%22.32%42.89%-18.40%40.93%

Correlation

The correlation between NEOV and LW is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2020

0.06

The correlation between NEOV and LW shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.07 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NEOV:

$79.17M

LW:

$5.93B

EPS

NEOV:

-$0.32

LW:

$2.15

PS Ratio

NEOV:

4.40

LW:

0.91

PB Ratio

NEOV:

3.57

LW:

3.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

NEOV:

$16.05M

LW:

$6.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NEOV:

$3.74M

LW:

$1.34B

EBITDA (TTM)

NEOV:

-$9.07M

LW:

$893.90M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEOV vs. LW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEOV
NEOV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
NEOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEOV Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
NEOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEOV Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

LW
LW Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
LW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
LW Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
LW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
LW Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEOV vs. LW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock (NEOV) and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEOVLWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

0.94

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

-0.52

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.00

-0.90

-0.10

NEOV vs. LW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEOV Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is higher than the LW Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEOV and LW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEOVLWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

-0.48

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

-0.29

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.15

-0.06

Drawdowns

NEOV vs. LW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEOV drawdown since its inception was -90.38%, which is greater than LW's maximum drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEOV and LW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEOVLWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.38%

-64.56%

-25.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.60%

-41.37%

-32.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.32%

-64.56%

-19.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.38%

-64.56%

-25.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-72.52%

-60.44%

-12.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.92%

-21.26%

-17.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.68%

23.67%

+12.01%

Volatility

NEOV vs. LW - Volatility Comparison

NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock (NEOV) has a higher volatility of 71.79% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) at 10.14%. This indicates that NEOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEOVLWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

71.79%

10.14%

+61.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

102.83%

38.17%

+64.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

121.65%

44.22%

+77.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

93.71%

37.84%

+55.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

86.56%

35.85%

+50.71%

Dividends

NEOV vs. LW - Dividend Comparison

NEOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
3.52%3.53%2.15%1.04%1.10%1.48%1.17%0.93%1.04%1.33%
NEOV
NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NEOV vs. LW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B202220232024202520260
1.56B
(NEOV) Total Revenue
(LW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NEOV and LW have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEOV has higher volatility (71.79%) compared to LW (10.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NEOV dropped -90.38% vs LW's -64.56%.

NEOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.29 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEOV and LW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer