PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NEM vs. BDGI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NEM vs. BDGI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Newmont Corporation (NEM) and Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. (BDGI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NEM is traded in USD, while BDGI.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the BDGI.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEM achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly lower than BDGI.TO's 26.22% return. Over the past 10 years, NEM has underperformed BDGI.TO with an annualized return of 13.46%, while BDGI.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.43% annualized return.


NEM

1D
-0.72%
1M
-14.84%
YTD
-0.43%
6M
11.71%
1Y
91.07%
3Y*
36.63%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
13.46%

BDGI.TO

1D
5.44%
1M
9.14%
YTD
26.22%
6M
21.04%
1Y
104.65%
3Y*
52.00%
5Y*
18.36%
10Y*
16.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NEM vs. BDGI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NEM
Newmont Corporation
-0.43%172.82%-7.83%-8.76%-20.77%7.40%40.28%30.52%-6.15%10.91%
BDGI.TO
Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd.
26.22%116.68%-17.29%59.81%-19.27%-14.92%12.95%15.26%11.51%-7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between NEM and BDGI.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006

0.09

The correlation between NEM and BDGI.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (10 years) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

NEM:

$6.34

BDGI.TO:

CA$2.01

PE Ratio

NEM:

15.62

BDGI.TO:

46.56

PEG Ratio

NEM:

0.41

BDGI.TO:

1.29

PS Ratio

NEM:

4.77

BDGI.TO:

3.31

Total Revenue (TTM)

NEM:

$17.23B

BDGI.TO:

CA$955.05M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NEM:

$8.97B

BDGI.TO:

CA$221.07M

EBITDA (TTM)

NEM:

$13.78B

BDGI.TO:

CA$178.82M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NEM vs. BDGI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

BDGI.TO
BDGI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BDGI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDGI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDGI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BDGI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDGI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEM vs. BDGI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Newmont Corporation (NEM) and Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. (BDGI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NEMBDGI.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.49

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

4.02

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.94

10.86

-1.92

NEM vs. BDGI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is lower than the BDGI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NEM and BDGI.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NEMBDGI.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

2.91

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.54

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.46

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.65

-0.53

Drawdowns

NEM vs. BDGI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEM drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, which is greater than BDGI.TO's maximum drawdown of -64.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEM and BDGI.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NEMBDGI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.30%

-64.68%

-16.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.25%

-26.18%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.57%

-34.01%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.40%

-42.44%

-19.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.40%

-64.68%

+2.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.65%

0.00%

-24.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.38%

-22.48%

-18.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.22%

9.67%

+0.55%

Volatility

NEM vs. BDGI.TO - Volatility Comparison

Newmont Corporation (NEM) has a higher volatility of 14.19% compared to Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. (BDGI.TO) at 8.66%. This indicates that NEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NEMBDGI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.19%

8.66%

+5.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.93%

30.63%

+6.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.87%

36.29%

+10.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.83%

34.03%

+3.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.59%

35.67%

-0.08%

Dividends

NEM vs. BDGI.TO - Dividend Comparison

NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than BDGI.TO's 0.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDGI.TO
Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd.
0.81%1.03%2.01%1.69%2.48%1.97%1.57%1.62%1.61%1.55%1.20%1.47%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.03%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%

Financials

NEM vs. BDGI.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Newmont Corporation and Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B202220232024202520260
203.24M
(NEM) Total Revenue
(BDGI.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. NEM values in USD, BDGI.TO values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


NEM and BDGI.TO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NEM and BDGI.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer