NBIS vs. L100.L
NBIS (Nebius Group N.V.) is a stock, while L100.L (Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc) is Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Over the past year, NBIS returned 351.53% vs 19.37% for L100.L. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NBIS vs. L100.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NBIS is traded in USD, while L100.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the L100.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBIS achieves a 160.44% return, which is significantly higher than L100.L's 5.25% return.
NBIS
- 1D
- -4.31%
- 1M
- 23.13%
- YTD
- 160.44%
- 6M
- 117.28%
- 1Y
- 351.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
L100.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- 5.25%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 19.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.27%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 8.56%
NBIS vs. L100.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 160.44% | 202.18% | 46.25% |
L100.L Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc | 5.25% | 35.31% | -5.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIS and L100.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2024 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIS vs. L100.L — Risk / Return Rank
NBIS
L100.L
NBIS vs. L100.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) and Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NBIS | L100.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.26 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.79 | 1.98 | +5.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.86 | 6.66 | +11.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBIS | L100.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.39 | 1.44 | +1.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.19 | 0.18 | +3.01 |
Drawdowns
NBIS vs. L100.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIS drawdown since its inception was -58.27%, roughly equal to the maximum L100.L drawdown of -60.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIS and L100.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIS | L100.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.27% | -60.70% | +2.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.47% | -9.73% | -35.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.58% | -4.83% | -12.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.02% | -14.16% | -4.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.79% | 2.90% | +16.89% |
Volatility
NBIS vs. L100.L - Volatility Comparison
Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a higher volatility of 33.60% compared to Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L) at 3.86%. This indicates that NBIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than L100.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIS | L100.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.60% | 3.86% | +29.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 71.53% | 11.26% | +60.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 104.78% | 13.41% | +91.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.72% | 16.56% | +94.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.72% | 18.32% | +92.40% |
Dividends
NBIS vs. L100.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither NBIS nor L100.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NBIS and L100.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NBIS and L100.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer