PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBIS vs. IONQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NBIS vs. IONQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBIS achieves a 160.44% return, which is significantly higher than IONQ's 39.96% return.


NBIS

1D
-4.31%
1M
23.13%
YTD
160.44%
6M
117.28%
1Y
351.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IONQ

1D
10.60%
1M
27.54%
YTD
39.96%
6M
15.53%
1Y
60.94%
3Y*
81.23%
5Y*
42.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBIS vs. IONQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NBIS
Nebius Group N.V.
160.44%202.18%46.25%
IONQ
IonQ, Inc.
39.96%7.42%234.16%

Correlation

The correlation between NBIS and IONQ is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024

0.44

The correlation between NBIS and IONQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NBIS:

$67.36B

IONQ:

$23.31B

EPS

NBIS:

$3.17

IONQ:

$0.86

PE Ratio

NBIS:

68.67

IONQ:

72.85

PS Ratio

NBIS:

65.42

IONQ:

107.88

PB Ratio

NBIS:

9.30

IONQ:

4.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

NBIS:

$877.90M

IONQ:

$187.12M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NBIS:

$420.60M

IONQ:

$71.25M

EBITDA (TTM)

NBIS:

-$52.78M

IONQ:

$405.86M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBIS vs. IONQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBIS
NBIS Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NBIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBIS Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
NBIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBIS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

IONQ
IONQ Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IONQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IONQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
IONQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
IONQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IONQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBIS vs. IONQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBISIONQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.17

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.79

0.91

+6.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.86

1.65

+16.21

NBIS vs. IONQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBIS Sharpe Ratio is 3.39, which is higher than the IONQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBIS and IONQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBISIONQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39

0.66

+2.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.19

0.39

+2.79

Drawdowns

NBIS vs. IONQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIS drawdown since its inception was -58.27%, smaller than the maximum IONQ drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIS and IONQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBISIONQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.27%

-90.00%

+31.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.47%

-67.61%

+22.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.58%

-23.50%

+5.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.02%

-50.97%

+31.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.79%

37.01%

-17.22%

Volatility

NBIS vs. IONQ - Volatility Comparison

Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) have volatilities of 33.60% and 32.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBISIONQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.60%

32.87%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

71.53%

68.37%

+3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

104.78%

92.93%

+11.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

110.72%

100.41%

+10.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

110.72%

97.59%

+13.13%

Dividends

NBIS vs. IONQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither NBIS nor IONQ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

NBIS vs. IONQ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nebius Group N.V. and IonQ, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
399.00M
64.67M
(NBIS) Total Revenue
(IONQ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NBIS and IONQ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBIS has higher volatility (33.60%) compared to IONQ (32.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBIS dropped -58.27% vs IONQ's -90.00%.

NBIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBIS and IONQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer