PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NASL.L vs. SXLK.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NASL.L vs. SXLK.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) and SPDR S&P U.S. Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLK.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NASL.L is traded in GBp, while SXLK.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SXLK.AS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NASL.L achieves a 17.60% return, which is significantly lower than SXLK.AS's 23.59% return.


NASL.L

1D
0.06%
1M
4.02%
YTD
17.60%
6M
15.44%
1Y
38.42%
3Y*
24.92%
5Y*
18.35%
10Y*
19.37%

SXLK.AS

1D
-2.24%
1M
9.03%
YTD
23.59%
6M
20.09%
1Y
52.64%
3Y*
26.52%
5Y*
22.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NASL.L vs. SXLK.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NASL.L
Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR
17.60%11.71%28.78%47.95%-25.38%29.78%43.43%19.99%-15.36%
SXLK.AS
SPDR S&P U.S. Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF
23.59%16.04%25.33%48.12%-21.16%37.65%39.16%42.77%-15.39%

Correlation

The correlation between NASL.L and SXLK.AS is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018

0.89

The correlation between NASL.L and SXLK.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NASL.L vs. SXLK.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NASL.L
NASL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
NASL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
NASL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SXLK.AS
SXLK.AS Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SXLK.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXLK.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXLK.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SXLK.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXLK.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NASL.L vs. SXLK.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) and SPDR S&P U.S. Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLK.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NASL.LSXLK.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.44

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

3.15

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.23

8.14

+2.09

NASL.L vs. SXLK.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NASL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the SXLK.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NASL.L and SXLK.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NASL.LSXLK.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

2.68

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

1.01

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.98

-0.25

Drawdowns

NASL.L vs. SXLK.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NASL.L drawdown since its inception was -41.96%, which is greater than SXLK.AS's maximum drawdown of -28.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASL.L and SXLK.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NASL.LSXLK.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.96%

-28.04%

-13.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.98%

-16.78%

+5.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.53%

-28.04%

+3.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.49%

-28.04%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-2.81%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.35%

-6.14%

-1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

6.52%

-2.77%

Volatility

NASL.L vs. SXLK.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) is 4.66%, while SPDR S&P U.S. Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLK.AS) has a volatility of 7.40%. This indicates that NASL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SXLK.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NASL.LSXLK.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.66%

7.40%

-2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.43%

14.51%

-4.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.76%

19.68%

-4.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.83%

21.86%

-1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.75%

22.61%

-1.86%

NASL.L vs. SXLK.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

NASL.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SXLK.AS's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

NASL.L vs. SXLK.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither NASL.L nor SXLK.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NASL.L
Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.69%0.61%0.68%
SXLK.AS
SPDR S&P U.S. Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, NASL.L and SXLK.AS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SXLK.AS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXLK.AS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NASL.L.

NASL.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SXLK.AS is Technology Equities. NASL.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while SXLK.AS tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NASL.L and 0.15% for SXLK.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NASL.L and SXLK.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer