NAIL vs. EEM
NAIL (Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares) and EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NAIL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index (300%), while EEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NAIL returned 3.80%/yr vs 9.37%/yr for EEM. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NAIL charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for EEM.
Performance
NAIL vs. EEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NAIL achieves a -23.54% return, which is significantly lower than EEM's 20.18% return. Over the past 10 years, NAIL has underperformed EEM with an annualized return of 3.80%, while EEM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.37% annualized return.
NAIL
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -3.69%
- YTD
- -23.54%
- 6M
- -33.60%
- 1Y
- -22.27%
- 3Y*
- -13.87%
- 5Y*
- -13.16%
- 10Y*
- 3.80%
EEM
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- YTD
- 20.18%
- 6M
- 22.10%
- 1Y
- 43.51%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 5.98%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
NAIL vs. EEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAIL Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares | -23.54% | -40.43% | -22.83% | 259.61% | -75.23% | 168.20% | -32.08% | 184.63% | -73.96% | 268.71% |
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 20.18% | 33.98% | 6.49% | 8.95% | -20.56% | -3.63% | 17.02% | 18.22% | -15.31% | 37.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between NAIL and EEM is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2015 | 0.41 |
NAIL vs. EEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NAIL
EEM
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
NAIL
EEM
Industrials
NAIL
EEM
Basic Materials
NAIL
EEM
Real Estate
NAIL
EEM
Communication Services
NAIL
-
EEM
Consumer Defensive
NAIL
-
EEM
Energy
NAIL
-
EEM
Financial Services
NAIL
-
EEM
Healthcare
NAIL
-
EEM
Technology
NAIL
-
EEM
Utilities
NAIL
-
EEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NAIL vs. EEM — Risk / Return Rank
NAIL
EEM
NAIL vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares (NAIL) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NAIL | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.39 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 3.23 | -3.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.58 | 12.20 | -12.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NAIL | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 | 2.07 | -2.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | 0.31 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 | 0.46 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | 0.37 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
NAIL vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NAIL drawdown since its inception was -93.75%, which is greater than EEM's maximum drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAIL and EEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NAIL | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.75% | -66.43% | -27.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.85% | -13.52% | -54.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.09% | -17.29% | -64.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.40% | -37.49% | -46.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.75% | -39.82% | -53.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.15% | -7.13% | -71.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.83% | -16.01% | -27.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.74% | 3.58% | +35.16% |
Volatility
NAIL vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares (NAIL) has a higher volatility of 21.13% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) at 10.60%. This indicates that NAIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NAIL | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.13% | 10.60% | +10.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.31% | 18.87% | +41.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.48% | 21.19% | +66.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 86.98% | 19.16% | +67.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.20% | 20.62% | +68.58% |
NAIL vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
NAIL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than EEM's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
NAIL vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison
NAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than EEM's 1.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 1.85% | 2.22% | 2.43% | 2.63% | 2.50% | 1.99% | 1.45% | 2.76% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 2.49% |
NAIL Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares | 1.04% | 1.55% | 0.63% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.17% | 0.35% | 1.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NAIL and EEM have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NAIL has higher volatility (21.13%) compared to EEM (10.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAIL dropped -93.75% vs EEM's -66.43%.
On 10-year performance, EEM leads with 9.37% vs 3.80% for NAIL. On fees, EEM is cheaper at 0.72% per year. On volatility, EEM has been the lower-risk option at 10.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EEM has performed better with a 9.37% return vs 3.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EEM is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NAIL.
EEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 1.04% for NAIL.
NAIL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. NAIL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index (300%), while EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NAIL and 0.72% for EEM.
EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NAIL and EEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer