NADQ.DE vs. XNAQ.L
NADQ.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist) and XNAQ.L (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - NADQ.DE tracks the Nasdaq 100® while XNAQ.L tracks the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NADQ.DE returned 18.92%/yr vs 18.17%/yr for XNAQ.L. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NADQ.DE charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XNAQ.L.
Performance
NADQ.DE vs. XNAQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NADQ.DE is traded in EUR, while XNAQ.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XNAQ.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NADQ.DE achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly higher than XNAQ.L's 18.43% return.
NADQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 5.87%
- YTD
- 20.63%
- 6M
- 18.75%
- 1Y
- 37.49%
- 3Y*
- 24.74%
- 5Y*
- 18.92%
- 10Y*
- 21.45%
XNAQ.L
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 3.80%
- YTD
- 18.43%
- 6M
- 16.39%
- 1Y
- 34.54%
- 3Y*
- 24.26%
- 5Y*
- 18.17%
- 10Y*
- —
NADQ.DE vs. XNAQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist | 20.63% | 7.04% | 34.07% | 51.46% | -29.91% | 33.09% |
XNAQ.L Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 18.43% | 5.89% | 34.84% | 50.95% | -29.29% | -3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between NADQ.DE and XNAQ.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2021 | 0.95 |
The correlation between NADQ.DE and XNAQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NADQ.DE vs. XNAQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
NADQ.DE
XNAQ.L
NADQ.DE vs. XNAQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NADQ.DE | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.39 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 3.41 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.32 | 10.20 | +1.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NADQ.DE | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 2.21 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.75 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.41 | +0.56 |
Drawdowns
NADQ.DE vs. XNAQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NADQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.44%, roughly equal to the maximum XNAQ.L drawdown of -33.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NADQ.DE and XNAQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NADQ.DE | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.44% | -33.06% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.97% | -10.07% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.70% | -26.50% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.16% | -31.21% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -2.78% | +1.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.93% | -12.38% | +6.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 3.38% | -0.03% |
Volatility
NADQ.DE vs. XNAQ.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L) have volatilities of 4.26% and 4.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NADQ.DE | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 4.44% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.95% | 10.95% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.74% | 15.57% | +0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 24.18% | -4.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 26.43% | -6.89% |
NADQ.DE vs. XNAQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
NADQ.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than XNAQ.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NADQ.DE vs. XNAQ.L - Dividend Comparison
NADQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while XNAQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.55% | 0.40% | 0.79% | 0.51% | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.63% |
XNAQ.L Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, NADQ.DE and XNAQ.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XNAQ.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNAQ.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for NADQ.DE.
NADQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while XNAQ.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for NADQ.DE and 0.20% for XNAQ.L.
Find the right allocation for NADQ.DE and XNAQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer