NADQ.DE vs. XLKQ.L
NADQ.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist) and XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - NADQ.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®, while XLKQ.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NADQ.DE returned 21.45%/yr vs 25.62%/yr for XLKQ.L. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NADQ.DE charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKQ.L.
Performance
NADQ.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NADQ.DE is traded in EUR, while XLKQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLKQ.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NADQ.DE having a 20.63% return and XLKQ.L slightly higher at 21.58%. Over the past 10 years, NADQ.DE has underperformed XLKQ.L with an annualized return of 21.45%, while XLKQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 25.62% annualized return.
NADQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 5.87%
- YTD
- 20.63%
- 6M
- 18.75%
- 1Y
- 37.49%
- 3Y*
- 24.74%
- 5Y*
- 18.92%
- 10Y*
- 21.45%
XLKQ.L
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 6.65%
- YTD
- 21.58%
- 6M
- 18.39%
- 1Y
- 45.40%
- 3Y*
- 32.28%
- 5Y*
- 25.66%
- 10Y*
- 25.62%
NADQ.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist | 20.63% | 7.04% | 34.07% | 51.46% | -29.91% | 39.75% | 34.72% | 43.03% | 3.29% | 15.73% |
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 21.58% | 9.72% | 50.98% | 55.05% | -24.67% | 45.15% | 30.44% | 53.56% | 1.28% | 17.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between NADQ.DE and XLKQ.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2009 | 0.80 |
The correlation between NADQ.DE and XLKQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.92 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NADQ.DE vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
NADQ.DE
XLKQ.L
NADQ.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NADQ.DE | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.37 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 2.86 | +0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.32 | 7.63 | +3.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NADQ.DE | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 2.27 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.96 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.11 | 1.08 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.79 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
NADQ.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NADQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.44%, smaller than the maximum XLKQ.L drawdown of -40.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NADQ.DE and XLKQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NADQ.DE | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.44% | -40.10% | +6.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.97% | -15.78% | +5.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.70% | -30.46% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.16% | -30.46% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.16% | -30.78% | -0.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -5.59% | +4.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.93% | -8.03% | +2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 5.93% | -2.58% |
Volatility
NADQ.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) is 4.26%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a volatility of 7.18%. This indicates that NADQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NADQ.DE | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 7.18% | -2.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.95% | 14.79% | -3.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.74% | 19.95% | -4.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 26.76% | -6.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 23.78% | -4.24% |
NADQ.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
NADQ.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NADQ.DE vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison
NADQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while XLKQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.55% | 0.40% | 0.79% | 0.51% | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.63% |
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, NADQ.DE and XLKQ.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for NADQ.DE.
NADQ.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XLKQ.L is Technology Equities. NADQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for NADQ.DE and 0.14% for XLKQ.L.
Find the right allocation for NADQ.DE and XLKQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer