NADQ.DE vs. XDWT.DE
NADQ.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist) and XDWT.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - NADQ.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®, while XDWT.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NADQ.DE returned 21.45%/yr vs 24.00%/yr for XDWT.DE. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NADQ.DE charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWT.DE.
Performance
NADQ.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NADQ.DE achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly lower than XDWT.DE's 25.23% return. Over the past 10 years, NADQ.DE has underperformed XDWT.DE with an annualized return of 21.45%, while XDWT.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 24.00% annualized return.
NADQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 5.87%
- YTD
- 20.63%
- 6M
- 18.75%
- 1Y
- 37.49%
- 3Y*
- 24.74%
- 5Y*
- 18.92%
- 10Y*
- 21.45%
XDWT.DE
- 1D
- -2.03%
- 1M
- 10.09%
- YTD
- 25.23%
- 6M
- 22.39%
- 1Y
- 47.87%
- 3Y*
- 29.29%
- 5Y*
- 22.52%
- 10Y*
- 24.00%
NADQ.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist | 20.63% | 7.04% | 34.07% | 51.46% | -29.91% | 39.75% | 34.72% | 43.03% | 3.29% | 15.73% |
XDWT.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C | 25.23% | 9.56% | 41.11% | 50.00% | -28.10% | 41.76% | 30.98% | 51.77% | 0.78% | 21.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between NADQ.DE and XDWT.DE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016 | 0.95 |
The correlation between NADQ.DE and XDWT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NADQ.DE vs. XDWT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
NADQ.DE
XDWT.DE
NADQ.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NADQ.DE | XDWT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.38 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 3.12 | +0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.32 | 8.24 | +3.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NADQ.DE | XDWT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 2.38 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.99 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.11 | 1.11 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 1.09 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
NADQ.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NADQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.44%, which is greater than XDWT.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NADQ.DE and XDWT.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NADQ.DE | XDWT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.44% | -31.61% | -1.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.97% | -15.59% | +5.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.70% | -29.46% | +2.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.16% | -29.46% | -1.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.16% | -31.61% | +0.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -2.61% | +1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.93% | -5.82% | -0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 5.91% | -2.56% |
Volatility
NADQ.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) is 4.26%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE) has a volatility of 7.11%. This indicates that NADQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NADQ.DE | XDWT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 7.11% | -2.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.95% | 14.96% | -4.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.74% | 20.39% | -4.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 22.55% | -2.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 21.46% | -1.92% |
NADQ.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NADQ.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWT.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NADQ.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Dividend Comparison
NADQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while XDWT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.55% | 0.40% | 0.79% | 0.51% | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.63% |
XDWT.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, NADQ.DE and XDWT.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, NADQ.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NADQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWT.DE.
NADQ.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XDWT.DE is Technology Equities. NADQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while XDWT.DE tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for NADQ.DE and 0.25% for XDWT.DE.
Find the right allocation for NADQ.DE and XDWT.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer