NADQ.DE vs. NASL.L
NADQ.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist) and NASL.L (Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR) are both Nasdaq-100 funds from Amundi - NADQ.DE tracks the Nasdaq 100® while NASL.L tracks the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NADQ.DE returned 21.45%/yr vs 18.28%/yr for NASL.L. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NADQ.DE charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for NASL.L.
Performance
NADQ.DE vs. NASL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NADQ.DE is traded in EUR, while NASL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the NASL.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NADQ.DE achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly higher than NASL.L's 18.71% return. Over the past 10 years, NADQ.DE has outperformed NASL.L with an annualized return of 21.45%, while NASL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 18.28% annualized return.
NADQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 5.87%
- YTD
- 20.63%
- 6M
- 18.85%
- 1Y
- 37.49%
- 3Y*
- 24.74%
- 5Y*
- 18.92%
- 10Y*
- 21.45%
NASL.L
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 4.02%
- YTD
- 18.71%
- 6M
- 16.61%
- 1Y
- 34.83%
- 3Y*
- 24.43%
- 5Y*
- 18.29%
- 10Y*
- 18.28%
NADQ.DE vs. NASL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist | 20.63% | 7.04% | 34.07% | 51.46% | -29.91% | 39.75% | 34.72% | 43.03% | 3.29% | 15.73% |
NASL.L Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR | 18.71% | 5.89% | 34.99% | 51.08% | -29.23% | 38.22% | 35.64% | 27.63% | 3.26% | 11.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between NADQ.DE and NASL.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2008 | 0.71 |
Over the past year, NADQ.DE and NASL.L have become more correlated (0.96) than their long-term average of 0.71, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NADQ.DE vs. NASL.L — Risk / Return Rank
NADQ.DE
NASL.L
NADQ.DE vs. NASL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) and Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NADQ.DE | NASL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.39 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 3.44 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.32 | 10.30 | +1.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NADQ.DE | NASL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 2.25 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.85 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.11 | 0.84 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.63 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
NADQ.DE vs. NASL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NADQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.44%, smaller than the maximum NASL.L drawdown of -55.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NADQ.DE and NASL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NADQ.DE | NASL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.44% | -55.82% | +22.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.97% | -10.07% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.70% | -26.49% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.16% | -31.17% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.16% | -31.17% | +0.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -2.69% | +1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.93% | -10.41% | +4.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 3.37% | -0.02% |
Volatility
NADQ.DE vs. NASL.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) and Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) have volatilities of 4.26% and 4.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NADQ.DE | NASL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 4.38% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.95% | 10.78% | +0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.74% | 15.41% | +0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 21.50% | -1.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 22.02% | -2.48% |
NADQ.DE vs. NASL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
NADQ.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than NASL.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
NADQ.DE vs. NASL.L - Dividend Comparison
NADQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while NASL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.55% | 0.40% | 0.79% | 0.51% | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.63% | 0.00% |
NASL.L Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 0.61% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, NADQ.DE and NASL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, NADQ.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NADQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NASL.L.
NADQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while NASL.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for NADQ.DE and 0.30% for NASL.L.
Find the right allocation for NADQ.DE and NASL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer