NA.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO
NA.TO (National Bank of Canada) and CRT-UN.TO (CT Real Estate Investment Trust) are both stocks. NA.TO operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while CRT-UN.TO operates in REIT - Retail (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, NA.TO returned 20.93%/yr vs 7.63%/yr for CRT-UN.TO. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NA.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NA.TO achieves a 19.25% return, which is significantly higher than CRT-UN.TO's 11.59% return. Over the past 10 years, NA.TO has outperformed CRT-UN.TO with an annualized return of 20.93%, while CRT-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.63% annualized return.
NA.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- YTD
- 19.25%
- 6M
- 20.62%
- 1Y
- 57.49%
- 3Y*
- 33.33%
- 5Y*
- 21.75%
- 10Y*
- 20.93%
CRT-UN.TO
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- 11.59%
- 6M
- 15.18%
- 1Y
- 16.30%
- 3Y*
- 12.39%
- 5Y*
- 7.05%
- 10Y*
- 7.63%
NA.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NA.TO National Bank of Canada | 19.25% | 36.15% | 34.65% | 15.53% | -1.45% | 39.02% | 4.01% | 34.04% | -6.92% | 19.77% |
CRT-UN.TO CT Real Estate Investment Trust | 11.59% | 20.98% | 3.91% | -0.26% | -5.16% | 16.12% | 2.73% | 47.59% | -15.85% | 1.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between NA.TO and CRT-UN.TO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.28 |
The correlation between NA.TO and CRT-UN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NA.TO:
CA$80.01B
CRT-UN.TO:
CA$3.51B
NA.TO:
CA$11.69
CRT-UN.TO:
CA$1.34
NA.TO:
17.49
CRT-UN.TO:
13.23
NA.TO:
4.89
CRT-UN.TO:
0.25
NA.TO:
2.95
CRT-UN.TO:
6.47
NA.TO:
2.58
CRT-UN.TO:
1.75
NA.TO:
CA$27.33B
CRT-UN.TO:
CA$611.41M
NA.TO:
CA$14.01B
CRT-UN.TO:
CA$477.02M
NA.TO:
CA$6.37B
CRT-UN.TO:
CA$623.97M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NA.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
NA.TO
CRT-UN.TO
NA.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National Bank of Canada (NA.TO) and CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NA.TO | CRT-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 1.22 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.43 | 2.63 | +3.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.65 | 6.86 | +14.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NA.TO | CRT-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.62 | 1.29 | +2.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.25 | 0.40 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.01 | 0.38 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.54 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
NA.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NA.TO drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than CRT-UN.TO's maximum drawdown of -45.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NA.TO and CRT-UN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NA.TO | CRT-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.45% | -45.88% | -9.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.99% | -6.24% | -2.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.58% | -17.38% | -5.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.58% | -24.70% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.22% | -45.88% | -2.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.21% | -0.84% | -3.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.76% | -6.26% | -0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.66% | 2.38% | +0.28% |
Volatility
NA.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison
National Bank of Canada (NA.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO) at 2.78%. This indicates that NA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRT-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NA.TO | CRT-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.02% | 2.78% | +3.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.56% | 9.36% | +4.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.99% | 12.74% | +3.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 17.64% | -0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.95% | 20.22% | +0.73% |
Dividends
NA.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison
NA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than CRT-UN.TO's 5.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRT-UN.TO CT Real Estate Investment Trust | 5.35% | 5.77% | 6.40% | 6.04% | 5.48% | 4.76% | 5.08% | 4.71% | 6.34% | 4.84% | 4.54% | 5.11% |
NA.TO National Bank of Canada | 2.37% | 2.75% | 3.36% | 4.03% | 4.03% | 3.11% | 3.96% | 3.77% | 4.44% | 3.70% | 4.03% | 5.16% |
Financials
NA.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between National Bank of Canada and CT Real Estate Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NA.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison
NA.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Bank of Canada reported a gross profit of 3.66B and revenue of 8.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.4%.
CRT-UN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CT Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 122.17M and revenue of 157.56M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.5%.
NA.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Bank of Canada reported an operating income of 1.62B and revenue of 8.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.0%.
CRT-UN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CT Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 118.00M and revenue of 157.56M, resulting in an operating margin of 74.9%.
NA.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Bank of Canada reported a net income of 1.23B and revenue of 8.07B, resulting in a net margin of 15.3%.
CRT-UN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CT Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 53.53M and revenue of 157.56M, resulting in a net margin of 34.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NA.TO and CRT-UN.TO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NA.TO and CRT-UN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer