PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVUS.L vs. XUCS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MVUS.L vs. XUCS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D (XUCS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MVUS.L is traded in GBp, while XUCS.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XUCS.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVUS.L achieves a 4.03% return, which is significantly lower than XUCS.DE's 7.09% return.


MVUS.L

1D
-0.44%
1M
4.47%
YTD
4.03%
6M
4.68%
1Y
11.77%
3Y*
11.21%
5Y*
9.95%
10Y*
11.19%

XUCS.DE

1D
0.16%
1M
-2.31%
YTD
7.09%
6M
7.00%
1Y
5.13%
3Y*
5.73%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVUS.L vs. XUCS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MVUS.L
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
4.03%3.88%20.71%3.83%-0.36%26.59%3.87%26.86%-0.36%9.29%
XUCS.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D
7.09%-3.18%16.18%-3.74%11.28%18.57%5.13%23.09%-3.32%5.27%

Correlation

The correlation between MVUS.L and XUCS.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2017

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between MVUS.L and XUCS.DE has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVUS.L vs. XUCS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVUS.L
MVUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
MVUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MVUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

XUCS.DE
XUCS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
XUCS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUCS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUCS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
XUCS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUCS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVUS.L vs. XUCS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D (XUCS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MVUS.LXUCS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.05

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

0.41

+1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.82

0.99

+5.83

MVUS.L vs. XUCS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the XUCS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVUS.L and XUCS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MVUS.LXUCS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

0.26

+1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.60

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.56

-0.07

Drawdowns

MVUS.L vs. XUCS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVUS.L drawdown since its inception was -39.22%, which is greater than XUCS.DE's maximum drawdown of -15.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVUS.L and XUCS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVUS.LXUCS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.22%

-15.90%

-23.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.39%

-8.79%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.40%

-11.60%

-8.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

-12.19%

-8.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-6.96%

+6.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.21%

-4.42%

-2.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

3.69%

-1.97%

Volatility

MVUS.L vs. XUCS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L) is 2.34%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D (XUCS.DE) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that MVUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XUCS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVUS.LXUCS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.34%

6.20%

-3.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.60%

11.61%

-6.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.05%

14.15%

-6.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.31%

13.57%

+4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.99%

14.76%

+2.23%

MVUS.L vs. XUCS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVUS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XUCS.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MVUS.L vs. XUCS.DE - Dividend Comparison

MVUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUCS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
MVUS.L
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUCS.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D
1.94%2.17%2.09%3.35%3.11%1.88%3.02%2.37%0.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


MVUS.L and XUCS.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUCS.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUCS.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MVUS.L.

MVUS.L is categorized as S&P 500, while XUCS.DE is Consumer Staples Equities. MVUS.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while XUCS.DE tracks MSCI USA Consumer Staples. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MVUS.L and 0.12% for XUCS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVUS.L and XUCS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer