PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MVUS.L vs. DEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MVUS.L vs. DEM

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

MVUS.L (iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and DEM (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MVUS.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while DEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MVUS.L returned 11.19%/yr vs 10.89%/yr for DEM. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MVUS.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for DEM.

Performance

MVUS.L vs. DEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MVUS.L is traded in GBp, while DEM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DEM values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVUS.L achieves a 4.03% return, which is significantly lower than DEM's 17.35% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MVUS.L having a 11.19% annualized return and DEM not far behind at 10.89%.

MVUS.L

1D
-0.44%
1M
4.47%
YTD
4.03%
6M
4.68%
1Y
11.77%
3Y*
11.21%
5Y*
9.95%
10Y*
11.19%

DEM

1D
0.51%
1M
1.17%
YTD
17.35%
6M
17.64%
1Y
28.60%
3Y*
14.70%
5Y*
10.25%
10Y*
10.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVUS.L vs. DEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MVUS.L
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		4.03%3.88%20.71%3.83%-0.36%26.59%3.87%26.86%-0.36%6.22%
DEM
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund		17.35%12.64%6.28%14.89%0.22%12.54%-8.61%15.28%-2.22%15.34%

Correlation

The correlation between MVUS.L and DEM is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2012

0.34

The correlation between MVUS.L and DEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MVUS.L vs. DEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MVUS.L
DEM

Technology

29.0%
17.4%

Financial Services

17.8%
21.9%

Healthcare

13.3%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

10.4%
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
5.0%

Communication Services

6.5%
3.0%

Industrials

5.7%
9.5%

Energy

5.2%
6.1%

Utilities

2.9%
3.0%

Basic Materials

2.3%
3.5%

Real Estate

0.2%
3.0%

Technology

MVUS.L
29.0%
DEM
17.4%

Financial Services

MVUS.L
17.8%
DEM
21.9%

Healthcare

MVUS.L
13.3%
DEM
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

MVUS.L
10.4%
DEM
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

MVUS.L
6.9%
DEM
5.0%

Communication Services

MVUS.L
6.5%
DEM
3.0%

Industrials

MVUS.L
5.7%
DEM
9.5%

Energy

MVUS.L
5.2%
DEM
6.1%

Utilities

MVUS.L
2.9%
DEM
3.0%

Basic Materials

MVUS.L
2.3%
DEM
3.5%

Real Estate

MVUS.L
0.2%
DEM
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund

Often compared with MVUS.L:
MVUS.L vs. USMVMVUS.L vs. XDEB.LMVUS.L vs. MVEA.LMVUS.L vs. GLTS.LMVUS.L vs. HMUD.LMVUS.L vs. XLPP.LMVUS.L vs. JURE.L
Often compared with DEM:
DEM vs. DVYEDEM vs. EEMDEM vs. FNDEDEM vs. AVEMDEM vs. DGREDEM vs. FEMKXDEM vs. VXUS

Return for Risk

MVUS.L vs. DEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MVUS.L
MVUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
MVUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MVUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
DEM
DEM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
DEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVUS.L vs. DEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MVUS.LDEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.46
2.39

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.07
3.25

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.45

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

4.48

-2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.82

16.57

-9.75

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MVUS.L vs. DEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the DEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVUS.L and DEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MVUS.LDEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

2.39

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.78

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.64

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.34

+0.15

Drawdowns

MVUS.L vs. DEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVUS.L drawdown since its inception was -39.22%, smaller than the maximum DEM drawdown of -41.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVUS.L and DEM.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MVUS.LDEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.22%

-41.34%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.39%

-6.41%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.40%

-13.58%

-6.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

-13.77%

-6.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.85%

-31.47%

+6.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-3.38%

+2.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.21%

-8.75%

+1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

1.73%

-0.01%

Volatility

MVUS.L vs. DEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L) is 2.34%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) has a volatility of 5.12%. This indicates that MVUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MVUS.LDEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.34%

5.12%

-2.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.60%

10.02%

-4.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.05%

12.06%

-4.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.31%

13.17%

+5.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.99%

17.05%

-0.06%

MVUS.L vs. DEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVUS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DEM's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

MVUS.L vs. DEM - Dividend Comparison

MVUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEM
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund		3.88%4.88%5.24%5.49%8.62%5.87%4.21%4.78%4.47%3.67%3.63%5.21%
MVUS.L
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

MVUS.L and DEM have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MVUS.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MVUS.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for DEM.

MVUS.L is categorized as S&P 500, while DEM is Emerging Markets Equities. MVUS.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while DEM tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity income Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MVUS.L and 0.63% for DEM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVUS.L and DEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer