PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MVEW.L vs. XDEM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MVEW.L vs. XDEM.L

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

MVEW.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XDEM.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - MVEW.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while XDEM.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MVEW.L returned 7.19%/yr vs 26.16%/yr for XDEM.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MVEW.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEM.L.

Performance

MVEW.L vs. XDEM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MVEW.L is traded in GBP, while XDEM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDEM.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVEW.L achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than XDEM.L's 20.43% return.

MVEW.L

1D
-0.16%
1M
3.06%
YTD
0.66%
6M
0.83%
1Y
3.24%
3Y*
7.19%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

XDEM.L

1D
0.58%
1M
5.51%
YTD
20.43%
6M
19.66%
1Y
32.95%
3Y*
26.16%
5Y*
14.45%
10Y*
16.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVEW.L vs. XDEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MVEW.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc)		0.66%3.61%12.60%3.91%-0.44%12.49%
XDEM.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C		20.43%12.52%32.87%5.88%-8.06%12.13%

Correlation

The correlation between MVEW.L and XDEM.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between MVEW.L and XDEM.L has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MVEW.L vs. XDEM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MVEW.L
XDEM.L

Technology

22.6%
34.6%

Financial Services

15.2%
18.9%

Healthcare

14.9%
6.0%

Communication Services

10.5%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

10.2%
1.2%

Industrials

8.2%
20.5%

Utilities

6.7%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
1.2%

Energy

3.3%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.5%
4.9%

Real Estate

1.4%
1.0%

Technology

MVEW.L
22.6%
XDEM.L
34.6%

Financial Services

MVEW.L
15.2%
XDEM.L
18.9%

Healthcare

MVEW.L
14.9%
XDEM.L
6.0%

Communication Services

MVEW.L
10.5%
XDEM.L
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

MVEW.L
10.2%
XDEM.L
1.2%

Industrials

MVEW.L
8.2%
XDEM.L
20.5%

Utilities

MVEW.L
6.7%
XDEM.L
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

MVEW.L
5.4%
XDEM.L
1.2%

Energy

MVEW.L
3.3%
XDEM.L
1.8%

Basic Materials

MVEW.L
1.5%
XDEM.L
4.9%

Real Estate

MVEW.L
1.4%
XDEM.L
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc)

Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C

Often compared with MVEW.L:
MVEW.L vs. MINV.LMVEW.L vs. JEPIMVEW.L vs. FLXD.LMVEW.L vs. MVOL.LMVEW.L vs. TDGB.LMVEW.L vs. XDEQ.LMVEW.L vs. SPY
Often compared with XDEM.L:
XDEM.L vs. XDEV.LXDEM.L vs. XDEM.DEXDEM.L vs. VHVG.LXDEM.L vs. MVOL.LXDEM.L vs. XDEB.LXDEM.L vs. EXCS.LXDEM.L vs. IUMF.L

Return for Risk

MVEW.L vs. XDEM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MVEW.L
MVEW.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MVEW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
XDEM.L
XDEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XDEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVEW.L vs. XDEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MVEW.LXDEM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.40
2.01

-1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.63
2.97

-2.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.36

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

3.64

-3.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.46

14.15

-12.69

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MVEW.L vs. XDEM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVEW.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the XDEM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVEW.L and XDEM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MVEW.LXDEM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

2.01

-1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.67

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.75

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.34

+0.32

Drawdowns

MVEW.L vs. XDEM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVEW.L drawdown since its inception was -10.07%, smaller than the maximum XDEM.L drawdown of -44.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVEW.L and XDEM.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MVEW.LXDEM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.07%

-44.39%

+34.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.78%

-9.01%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.99%

-21.17%

+12.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-21.17%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-23.38%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.73%

-2.24%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.66%

-12.48%

+9.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

2.32%

-0.10%

Volatility

MVEW.L vs. XDEM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L) is 2.70%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that MVEW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MVEW.LXDEM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

6.04%

-3.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.97%

13.94%

-7.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.11%

16.37%

-8.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.86%

21.50%

-11.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.86%

22.31%

-12.45%

MVEW.L vs. XDEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVEW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEM.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

MVEW.L vs. XDEM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MVEW.L nor XDEM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

MVEW.L and XDEM.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEM.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEM.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MVEW.L.

MVEW.L is categorized as Global Equities, while XDEM.L is Momentum. MVEW.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while XDEM.L tracks MSCI World Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for MVEW.L and 0.25% for XDEM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVEW.L and XDEM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer