PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUFG vs. PFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MUFG vs. PFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG) and Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUFG achieves a 25.60% return, which is significantly higher than PFG's 21.10% return. Over the past 10 years, MUFG has outperformed PFG with an annualized return of 17.84%, while PFG has yielded a comparatively lower 13.61% annualized return.


MUFG

1D
0.05%
1M
10.97%
YTD
25.60%
6M
25.13%
1Y
46.00%
3Y*
45.96%
5Y*
32.45%
10Y*
17.84%

PFG

1D
-0.18%
1M
5.34%
YTD
21.10%
6M
22.95%
1Y
41.47%
3Y*
17.87%
5Y*
14.05%
10Y*
13.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUFG vs. PFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MUFG
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
25.60%39.96%40.10%33.50%27.37%25.70%-15.99%11.50%-33.01%20.99%
PFG
Principal Financial Group, Inc.
21.10%18.38%1.87%-2.83%20.10%51.35%-5.19%29.71%-34.96%25.52%

Correlation

The correlation between MUFG and PFG is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2001

0.39

The correlation between MUFG and PFG shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (3 years) to 0.42 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MUFG:

$222.81B

PFG:

$23.14B

EPS

MUFG:

$214.15

PFG:

$6.97

PE Ratio

MUFG:

0.09

PFG:

15.06

PEG Ratio

MUFG:

0.00

PFG:

0.22

PS Ratio

MUFG:

0.02

PFG:

1.95

PB Ratio

MUFG:

0.01

PFG:

1.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

MUFG:

$13.21T

PFG:

$12.07B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MUFG:

$7.24T

PFG:

$5.76B

EBITDA (TTM)

MUFG:

$3.34T

PFG:

$1.39B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUFG vs. PFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUFG
MUFG Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MUFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUFG Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
MUFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUFG Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

PFG
PFG Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFG Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFG Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUFG vs. PFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG) and Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUFGPFGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.33

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

3.48

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.49

11.28

-3.79

MUFG vs. PFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUFG Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the PFG Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUFG and PFG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUFGPFGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

1.92

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

0.53

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.43

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.23

-0.05

Drawdowns

MUFG vs. PFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUFG drawdown since its inception was -76.75%, smaller than the maximum PFG drawdown of -91.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUFG and PFG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUFGPFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.75%

-91.50%

+14.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.28%

-11.96%

-5.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.56%

-22.43%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.81%

-29.32%

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.62%

-64.73%

+7.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-0.18%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.56%

-21.85%

-21.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.16%

3.69%

+2.47%

Volatility

MUFG vs. PFG - Volatility Comparison

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG) has a higher volatility of 5.66% compared to Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG) at 4.90%. This indicates that MUFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUFGPFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.66%

4.90%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.14%

15.63%

+3.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.83%

21.73%

+4.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.05%

26.63%

+2.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.88%

31.96%

-4.08%

Dividends

MUFG vs. PFG - Dividend Comparison

MUFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than PFG's 3.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUFG
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.13%3.12%2.50%2.90%3.36%2.18%2.62%0.00%0.00%2.20%2.70%2.34%
PFG
Principal Financial Group, Inc.
3.04%3.49%3.68%3.30%3.05%3.37%4.52%3.96%4.75%2.65%2.78%3.33%

Financials

MUFG vs. PFG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. and Principal Financial Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00T2.00T3.00T4.00T20222023202420252026
3.59T
135.60M
(MUFG) Total Revenue
(PFG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MUFG and PFG have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUFG has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to PFG (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUFG dropped -76.75% vs PFG's -91.50%.

PFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUFG and PFG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer