MUB vs. HYGI
MUB (iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF) and HYGI (iShares Inflation Hedged High Yield Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MUB is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index, while HYGI is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the BlackRock Inflation Hedged High Yield Bond Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MUB charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for HYGI.
Performance
MUB vs. HYGI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MUB
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 1.69%
- 1Y
- 6.99%
- 3Y*
- 3.29%
- 5Y*
- 0.77%
- 10Y*
- 1.94%
HYGI
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MUB vs. HYGI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUB iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF | 1.17% | 3.78% | 1.26% | 5.56% | 1.04% |
HYGI iShares Inflation Hedged High Yield Bond ETF | 0.00% | 6.20% | 9.16% | 11.71% | 0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUB and HYGI is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2022 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MUB and HYGI has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUB vs. HYGI — Risk / Return Rank
MUB
HYGI
MUB vs. HYGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) and iShares Inflation Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MUB | HYGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.85 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MUB | HYGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | — | — |
Drawdowns
MUB vs. HYGI - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUB | HYGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | — | — |
Volatility
MUB vs. HYGI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUB | HYGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.99% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.23% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.90% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.06% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.92% | — | — |
MUB vs. HYGI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than HYGI's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUB vs. HYGI - Dividend Comparison
MUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, while HYGI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYGI iShares Inflation Hedged High Yield Bond ETF | 0.97% | 3.41% | 6.08% | 6.22% | 3.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MUB iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF | 3.18% | 3.14% | 3.01% | 2.65% | 2.11% | 1.81% | 2.11% | 2.42% | 2.46% | 2.26% | 2.21% | 2.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUB and HYGI have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MUB is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUB is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for HYGI.
MUB has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 0.97% for HYGI.
MUB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while HYGI is Inflation-Protected Bonds. MUB tracks S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index, while HYGI tracks BlackRock Inflation Hedged High Yield Bond Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for MUB and 0.52% for HYGI.
Find the right allocation for MUB and HYGI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer