MUB vs. CMDY
MUB (iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF) and CMDY (iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MUB is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index, while CMDY is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MUB returned 0.77%/yr vs 9.88%/yr for CMDY. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. MUB charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for CMDY.
Performance
MUB vs. CMDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUB achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than CMDY's 21.76% return.
MUB
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 1.69%
- 1Y
- 6.99%
- 3Y*
- 3.29%
- 5Y*
- 0.77%
- 10Y*
- 1.94%
CMDY
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -3.10%
- YTD
- 21.76%
- 6M
- 21.83%
- 1Y
- 31.65%
- 3Y*
- 14.14%
- 5Y*
- 9.88%
- 10Y*
- —
MUB vs. CMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUB iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF | 1.17% | 3.78% | 1.26% | 5.56% | -7.34% | 1.02% | 5.12% | 7.06% | 2.59% |
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF | 21.76% | 15.81% | 5.43% | -9.33% | 14.55% | 26.38% | 1.15% | 4.96% | -11.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUB and CMDY is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2018 | -0.02 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between MUB and CMDY has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.02 to -0.22, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUB vs. CMDY — Risk / Return Rank
MUB
CMDY
MUB vs. CMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MUB | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.35 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 4.11 | -1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.85 | 11.95 | -3.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MUB | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 1.96 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.63 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.53 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
MUB vs. CMDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUB drawdown since its inception was -13.68%, smaller than the maximum CMDY drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUB and CMDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUB | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.68% | -31.19% | +17.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | -7.73% | +4.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.34% | -10.08% | +4.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.88% | -26.56% | +14.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -6.78% | +6.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -13.13% | +10.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 2.66% | -1.87% |
Volatility
MUB vs. CMDY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) is 0.99%, while iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) has a volatility of 5.12%. This indicates that MUB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUB | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.99% | 5.12% | -4.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.23% | 14.45% | -12.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.90% | 16.28% | -13.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.06% | 15.83% | -11.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 14.65% | -9.73% |
MUB vs. CMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CMDY's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUB vs. CMDY - Dividend Comparison
MUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than CMDY's 10.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF | 10.59% | 12.89% | 4.23% | 5.10% | 3.98% | 16.09% | 0.15% | 2.21% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MUB iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF | 3.18% | 3.14% | 3.01% | 2.65% | 2.11% | 1.81% | 2.11% | 2.42% | 2.46% | 2.26% | 2.21% | 2.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUB and CMDY have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMDY has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to MUB (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUB dropped -13.68% vs CMDY's -31.19%.
On 5-year performance, CMDY leads with 9.88% vs 0.77% for MUB. On fees, MUB is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, MUB has been the lower-risk option at 0.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CMDY has performed better with a 9.88% return vs 0.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MUB is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CMDY.
CMDY has the higher dividend yield at 10.59%, compared with 3.18% for MUB.
MUB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while CMDY is Commodities. MUB tracks S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index, while CMDY tracks Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for MUB and 0.28% for CMDY.
MUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MUB and CMDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer