PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MU vs. VAPX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MU vs. VAPX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MU is traded in USD, while VAPX.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VAPX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 232.74% return, which is significantly higher than VAPX.L's 39.58% return. Over the past 10 years, MU has outperformed VAPX.L with an annualized return of 55.03%, while VAPX.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.74% annualized return.


MU

1D
9.87%
1M
27.11%
YTD
232.74%
6M
284.77%
1Y
776.52%
3Y*
144.94%
5Y*
65.39%
10Y*
55.03%

VAPX.L

1D
0.35%
1M
-2.11%
YTD
39.58%
6M
44.97%
1Y
70.32%
3Y*
25.08%
5Y*
10.60%
10Y*
11.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MU vs. VAPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
232.74%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%24.21%39.79%69.49%-22.84%87.59%
VAPX.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing
39.58%41.25%-5.11%9.37%-12.16%0.91%18.84%17.37%-14.69%31.84%

Correlation

The correlation between MU and VAPX.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2013

0.36

The correlation between MU and VAPX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MU vs. VAPX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

VAPX.L
VAPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VAPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MU vs. VAPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUVAPX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+8.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.81

1.54

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

25.90

4.63

+21.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

100.37

17.93

+82.44

MU vs. VAPX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MU Sharpe Ratio is 11.44, which is higher than the VAPX.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MU and VAPX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUVAPX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.44

3.02

+8.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.24

0.55

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

0.61

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.43

-0.13

Drawdowns

MU vs. VAPX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than VAPX.L's maximum drawdown of -38.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and VAPX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUVAPX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.25%

-38.96%

-59.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.28%

-15.09%

-15.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.63%

-20.38%

-37.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.63%

-31.90%

-25.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.63%

-38.96%

-18.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.07%

-9.65%

-2.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.19%

-10.17%

-48.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.80%

3.91%

+3.89%

Volatility

MU vs. VAPX.L - Volatility Comparison

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 34.16% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) at 12.47%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUVAPX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

34.16%

12.47%

+21.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.74%

20.85%

+35.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.70%

23.25%

+45.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.91%

19.18%

+33.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.99%

19.32%

+30.67%

Dividends

MU vs. VAPX.L - Dividend Comparison

MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than VAPX.L's 1.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.05%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VAPX.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing
1.91%2.70%3.47%3.53%4.32%3.51%2.08%3.39%3.52%3.10%2.71%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


MU and VAPX.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MU and VAPX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer