MU vs. L100.L
MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock, while L100.L (Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc) is Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Over the past 10 years, MU returned 55.03%/yr vs 8.56%/yr for L100.L. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MU vs. L100.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MU is traded in USD, while L100.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the L100.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 232.74% return, which is significantly higher than L100.L's 5.25% return. Over the past 10 years, MU has outperformed L100.L with an annualized return of 55.03%, while L100.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.56% annualized return.
MU
- 1D
- 9.87%
- 1M
- 27.11%
- YTD
- 232.74%
- 6M
- 284.77%
- 1Y
- 776.52%
- 3Y*
- 144.94%
- 5Y*
- 65.39%
- 10Y*
- 55.03%
L100.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- 5.25%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 19.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.27%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 8.56%
MU vs. L100.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 232.74% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
L100.L Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc | 5.25% | 35.31% | 7.47% | 13.03% | -6.35% | 16.85% | -9.09% | 22.11% | -14.28% | 22.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between MU and L100.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MU vs. L100.L — Risk / Return Rank
MU
L100.L
MU vs. L100.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MU | L100.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +10.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.81 | 1.26 | +0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 25.90 | 1.98 | +23.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 100.37 | 6.66 | +93.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MU | L100.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.44 | 1.44 | +10.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.24 | 0.64 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.11 | 0.47 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.18 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
MU vs. L100.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than L100.L's maximum drawdown of -60.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and L100.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MU | L100.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.25% | -60.70% | -37.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.28% | -9.73% | -20.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.63% | -13.73% | -43.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.63% | -26.01% | -31.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.63% | -42.27% | -15.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.07% | -4.83% | -7.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.19% | -14.16% | -44.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.80% | 2.90% | +4.90% |
Volatility
MU vs. L100.L - Volatility Comparison
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 34.16% compared to Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L) at 3.86%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than L100.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MU | L100.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.16% | 3.86% | +30.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.74% | 11.26% | +45.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.70% | 13.41% | +55.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.91% | 16.56% | +36.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.99% | 18.32% | +31.67% |
Dividends
MU vs. L100.L - Dividend Comparison
MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while L100.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L100.L Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MU and L100.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MU and L100.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer