MTZ vs. STN
MTZ (MasTec, Inc.) and STN (Stantec Inc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Engineering & Construction industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, MTZ returned 32.06%/yr vs 12.56%/yr for STN. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MTZ vs. STN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTZ achieves a 66.40% return, which is significantly higher than STN's -21.89% return. Over the past 10 years, MTZ has outperformed STN with an annualized return of 32.06%, while STN has yielded a comparatively lower 12.56% annualized return.
MTZ
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -12.69%
- YTD
- 66.40%
- 6M
- 63.98%
- 1Y
- 120.95%
- 3Y*
- 48.70%
- 5Y*
- 24.55%
- 10Y*
- 32.06%
STN
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -15.85%
- YTD
- -21.89%
- 6M
- -22.73%
- 1Y
- -30.32%
- 3Y*
- 7.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.85%
- 10Y*
- 12.56%
MTZ vs. STN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTZ MasTec, Inc. | 66.40% | 59.67% | 79.79% | -11.26% | -7.53% | 35.35% | 6.27% | 58.19% | -17.14% | 27.97% |
STN Stantec Inc | -21.89% | 21.08% | -1.44% | 68.90% | -13.76% | 75.67% | 16.56% | 31.83% | -20.43% | 12.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTZ and STN is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2005 | 0.32 |
Fundamentals
MTZ:
$28.50B
STN:
$8.38B
MTZ:
$5.71
STN:
$3.98
MTZ:
63.34
STN:
18.44
MTZ:
0.60
STN:
0.76
MTZ:
1.87
STN:
1.08
MTZ:
8.61
STN:
2.48
MTZ:
$15.28B
STN:
$7.77B
MTZ:
$1.85B
STN:
$3.11B
MTZ:
$1.10B
STN:
$1.05B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTZ vs. STN — Risk / Return Rank
MTZ
STN
MTZ vs. STN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) and Stantec Inc (STN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MTZ | STN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 0.81 | +0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.02 | -0.85 | +7.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.90 | -1.94 | +23.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MTZ | STN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.17 | -1.10 | +4.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.47 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.49 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.40 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
MTZ vs. STN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTZ drawdown since its inception was -97.72%, which is greater than STN's maximum drawdown of -67.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTZ and STN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTZ | STN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.72% | -67.42% | -30.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.33% | -35.66% | +18.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.01% | -35.66% | -25.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.01% | -35.66% | -25.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.92% | -35.66% | -32.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.33% | -35.06% | +17.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.89% | -17.11% | -34.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.55% | 15.63% | -10.08% |
Volatility
MTZ vs. STN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) is 11.37%, while Stantec Inc (STN) has a volatility of 13.19%. This indicates that MTZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTZ | STN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.37% | 13.19% | -1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.25% | 23.93% | +5.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.48% | 27.82% | +10.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.57% | 25.23% | +17.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.74% | 25.65% | +18.09% |
Dividends
MTZ vs. STN - Dividend Comparison
MTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTZ MasTec, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STN Stantec Inc | 1.07% | 0.69% | 0.78% | 0.79% | 1.14% | 1.17% | 1.42% | 1.55% | 1.91% | 1.79% | 1.78% | 1.69% |
Financials
MTZ vs. STN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MasTec, Inc. and Stantec Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MTZ vs. STN - Profitability Comparison
MTZ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported a gross profit of 477.90M and revenue of 3.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.5%.
STN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stantec Inc reported a gross profit of 821.42M and revenue of 2.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.
MTZ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported an operating income of 141.80M and revenue of 3.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.
STN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stantec Inc reported an operating income of 175.05M and revenue of 2.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.4%.
MTZ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MasTec, Inc. reported a net income of 60.84M and revenue of 3.83B, resulting in a net margin of 1.6%.
STN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stantec Inc reported a net income of 111.09M and revenue of 2.07B, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MTZ and STN have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STN has higher volatility (13.19%) compared to MTZ (11.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTZ dropped -97.72% vs STN's -67.42%.
MTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTZ and STN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer