MTSFY vs. VTR
MTSFY (Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR) and VTR (Ventas, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — MTSFY in Real Estate - Diversified, VTR in REIT - Healthcare Facilities. Over the past 5 years, MTSFY returned 3.05%/yr vs 10.32%/yr for VTR. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MTSFY vs. VTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTSFY achieves a -18.54% return, which is significantly lower than VTR's 3.55% return.
MTSFY
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -12.94%
- YTD
- -18.54%
- 6M
- -19.49%
- 1Y
- -2.62%
- 3Y*
- 12.12%
- 5Y*
- 3.05%
- 10Y*
- —
VTR
- 1D
- -2.93%
- 1M
- -8.76%
- YTD
- 3.55%
- 6M
- -0.47%
- 1Y
- 28.55%
- 3Y*
- 24.27%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 5.81%
MTSFY vs. VTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTSFY Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR | -18.54% | 43.82% | -0.71% | 34.87% | -7.78% | -8.75% | -11.04% | 11.36% | 4.33% |
VTR Ventas, Inc. | 3.55% | 35.09% | 22.24% | 15.06% | -8.53% | 7.73% | -9.80% | 3.42% | 25.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTSFY and VTR is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
MTSFY:
$25.18B
VTR:
$38.75B
MTSFY:
$306.23
VTR:
$0.55
MTSFY:
0.09
VTR:
144.46
MTSFY:
0.01
VTR:
4.13
MTSFY:
0.01
VTR:
6.13
MTSFY:
0.01
VTR:
2.95
MTSFY:
$2.74T
VTR:
$6.13B
MTSFY:
$604.28B
VTR:
-$261.17M
MTSFY:
$547.07B
VTR:
$2.45B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTSFY vs. VTR — Risk / Return Rank
MTSFY
VTR
MTSFY vs. VTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR (MTSFY) and Ventas, Inc. (VTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MTSFY | VTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.29 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 2.29 | -2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.20 | 9.00 | -9.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MTSFY | VTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | 1.51 | -1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.42 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.30 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
MTSFY vs. VTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTSFY drawdown since its inception was -52.08%, smaller than the maximum VTR drawdown of -83.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTSFY and VTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTSFY | VTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.08% | -83.38% | +31.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.56% | -12.52% | -22.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.56% | -19.35% | -15.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.56% | -41.80% | +7.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.68% | -11.88% | -21.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.93% | -18.20% | -1.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.95% | 3.18% | +9.77% |
Volatility
MTSFY vs. VTR - Volatility Comparison
Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR (MTSFY) has a higher volatility of 13.86% compared to Ventas, Inc. (VTR) at 7.93%. This indicates that MTSFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTSFY | VTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.86% | 7.93% | +5.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.57% | 14.62% | +9.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.22% | 19.04% | +12.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.63% | 24.96% | +4.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.72% | 34.77% | -1.05% |
Dividends
MTSFY vs. VTR - Dividend Comparison
MTSFY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTSFY Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR | 0.00% | 0.98% | 1.26% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTR Ventas, Inc. | 2.46% | 2.48% | 3.06% | 3.61% | 4.00% | 3.52% | 4.37% | 5.49% | 5.40% | 5.19% | 4.74% | 20.47% |
Financials
MTSFY vs. VTR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR and Ventas, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MTSFY vs. VTR - Profitability Comparison
MTSFY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 133.63B and revenue of 741.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.0%.
VTR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ventas, Inc. reported a gross profit of 655.41M and revenue of 1.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.
MTSFY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 96.91B and revenue of 741.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.
VTR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ventas, Inc. reported an operating income of 191.56M and revenue of 1.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.
MTSFY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR reported a net income of 59.90B and revenue of 741.27B, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.
VTR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ventas, Inc. reported a net income of 55.91M and revenue of 1.66B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MTSFY and VTR have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTSFY has higher volatility (13.86%) compared to VTR (7.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTSFY dropped -52.08% vs VTR's -83.38%.
VTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTSFY and VTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer