PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTSFY vs. AVB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MTSFY vs. AVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR (MTSFY) and AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (AVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTSFY achieves a -18.54% return, which is significantly lower than AVB's 4.63% return.


MTSFY

1D
1.35%
1M
-12.94%
YTD
-18.54%
6M
-19.49%
1Y
-2.62%
3Y*
12.12%
5Y*
3.05%
10Y*

AVB

1D
-1.11%
1M
1.92%
YTD
4.63%
6M
7.83%
1Y
-4.05%
3Y*
3.50%
5Y*
1.10%
10Y*
4.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTSFY vs. AVB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR
-18.54%43.82%-0.71%34.87%-7.78%-8.75%-11.04%11.36%4.33%
AVB
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
4.63%-14.60%21.44%20.34%-33.92%62.17%-20.27%24.10%13.39%

Correlation

The correlation between MTSFY and AVB is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MTSFY:

$25.18B

AVB:

$26.42B

EPS

MTSFY:

$306.23

AVB:

$8.02

PE Ratio

MTSFY:

0.09

AVB:

23.40

PEG Ratio

MTSFY:

0.01

AVB:

13.46

PS Ratio

MTSFY:

0.01

AVB:

8.72

PB Ratio

MTSFY:

0.01

AVB:

2.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

MTSFY:

$2.74T

AVB:

$3.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MTSFY:

$604.28B

AVB:

$2.08B

EBITDA (TTM)

MTSFY:

$547.07B

AVB:

$1.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTSFY vs. AVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTSFY
MTSFY Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MTSFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTSFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTSFY Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
MTSFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTSFY Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

AVB
AVB Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
AVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVB Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
AVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVB Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTSFY vs. AVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR (MTSFY) and AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (AVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MTSFYAVBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.98

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.08

-0.19

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.20

-0.37

+0.17

MTSFY vs. AVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTSFY Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is higher than the AVB Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTSFY and AVB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MTSFYAVBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

-0.20

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.05

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.42

-0.31

Drawdowns

MTSFY vs. AVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTSFY drawdown since its inception was -52.08%, smaller than the maximum AVB drawdown of -70.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTSFY and AVB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTSFYAVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.08%

-70.04%

+17.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.56%

-20.87%

-13.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.56%

-29.40%

-5.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.56%

-38.36%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.68%

-16.71%

-16.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.93%

-11.74%

-8.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.95%

10.95%

+2.00%

Volatility

MTSFY vs. AVB - Volatility Comparison

Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR (MTSFY) has a higher volatility of 13.86% compared to AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (AVB) at 5.81%. This indicates that MTSFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTSFYAVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.86%

5.81%

+8.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.57%

15.17%

+9.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.22%

20.23%

+10.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.63%

22.21%

+7.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.72%

24.69%

+9.03%

Dividends

MTSFY vs. AVB - Dividend Comparison

MTSFY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVB
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
3.75%3.86%3.09%3.53%3.94%2.52%3.96%2.90%3.38%3.18%3.05%2.72%
MTSFY
Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR
0.00%0.98%1.26%0.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MTSFY vs. AVB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR and AvalonBay Communities, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00B400.00B600.00B800.00B1.00T20222023202420252026
741.27B
770.28M
(MTSFY) Total Revenue
(AVB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MTSFY vs. AVB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR and AvalonBay Communities, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
18.0%
67.7%
Portfolio components
MTSFY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 133.63B and revenue of 741.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.0%.

AVB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AvalonBay Communities, Inc. reported a gross profit of 521.68M and revenue of 770.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.7%.

MTSFY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 96.91B and revenue of 741.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.

AVB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AvalonBay Communities, Inc. reported an operating income of 218.54M and revenue of 770.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.

MTSFY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR reported a net income of 59.90B and revenue of 741.27B, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.

AVB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AvalonBay Communities, Inc. reported a net income of 325.73M and revenue of 770.28M, resulting in a net margin of 42.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MTSFY and AVB have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTSFY has higher volatility (13.86%) compared to AVB (5.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTSFY dropped -52.08% vs AVB's -70.04%.

MTSFY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTSFY and AVB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer