PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTN vs. SCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MTN vs. SCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) and Steelcase Inc. (SCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MTN

1D
1.36%
1M
9.40%
YTD
5.09%
6M
-1.45%
1Y
-2.97%
3Y*
-12.71%
5Y*
-12.18%
10Y*
2.68%

SCS

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTN vs. SCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MTN
Vail Resorts, Inc.
5.09%-24.88%-7.96%-7.06%-24.89%18.15%17.77%17.34%1.74%34.43%
SCS
Steelcase Inc.
0.00%39.89%-9.11%97.75%-36.31%-9.87%-31.43%42.60%1.19%-12.18%

Correlation

The correlation between MTN and SCS is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 1998

0.31

The correlation between MTN and SCS shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

MTN:

$5.62

SCS:

$0.80

PE Ratio

MTN:

24.41

SCS:

20.20

PEG Ratio

MTN:

0.60

SCS:

0.09

PS Ratio

MTN:

1.31

SCS:

0.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

MTN:

$2.83B

SCS:

$3.26B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MTN:

$2.12B

SCS:

$1.09B

EBITDA (TTM)

MTN:

$499.82M

SCS:

$208.30M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTN vs. SCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTN
MTN Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MTN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTN Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
MTN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTN Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

SCS
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTN vs. SCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) and Steelcase Inc. (SCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MTNSCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.20

MTN vs. SCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MTNSCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

Drawdowns

MTN vs. SCS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTNSCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.74%

Volatility

MTN vs. SCS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTNSCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.29%

Dividends

MTN vs. SCS - Dividend Comparison

MTN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, while SCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTN
Vail Resorts, Inc.
6.47%6.69%4.74%3.86%3.21%0.54%0.63%2.94%2.79%1.98%2.01%1.95%
SCS
Steelcase Inc.
1.24%1.86%4.23%2.22%6.93%4.56%2.73%2.83%3.64%3.36%3.31%2.27%

Financials

MTN vs. SCS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vail Resorts, Inc. and Steelcase Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
1.21B
897.10M
(MTN) Total Revenue
(SCS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MTN vs. SCS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Vail Resorts, Inc. and Steelcase Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
95.3%
34.8%
Portfolio components
MTN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.15B and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.3%.

SCS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steelcase Inc. reported a gross profit of 312.10M and revenue of 897.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.

MTN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported an operating income of 494.13M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.0%.

SCS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steelcase Inc. reported an operating income of 53.10M and revenue of 897.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.

MTN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported a net income of 314.44M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 26.1%.

SCS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steelcase Inc. reported a net income of 35.00M and revenue of 897.10M, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MTN and SCS have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTN and SCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer