MTN vs. JBL
MTN (Vail Resorts, Inc.) and JBL (Jabil Inc.) are both stocks. MTN operates in Resorts & Casinos (Consumer Cyclical), while JBL operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, MTN returned 2.68%/yr vs 35.40%/yr for JBL. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MTN vs. JBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTN achieves a 5.09% return, which is significantly lower than JBL's 59.70% return. Over the past 10 years, MTN has underperformed JBL with an annualized return of 2.68%, while JBL has yielded a comparatively higher 35.40% annualized return.
MTN
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 9.40%
- YTD
- 5.09%
- 6M
- -1.45%
- 1Y
- -2.97%
- 3Y*
- -12.71%
- 5Y*
- -12.18%
- 10Y*
- 2.68%
JBL
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- 2.50%
- YTD
- 59.70%
- 6M
- 61.54%
- 1Y
- 106.33%
- 3Y*
- 57.02%
- 5Y*
- 45.20%
- 10Y*
- 35.40%
MTN vs. JBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTN Vail Resorts, Inc. | 5.09% | -24.88% | -7.96% | -7.06% | -24.89% | 18.15% | 17.77% | 17.34% | 1.74% | 34.43% |
JBL Jabil Inc. | 59.70% | 58.73% | 13.25% | 87.43% | -2.55% | 66.40% | 3.89% | 68.49% | -4.41% | 12.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTN and JBL is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 1997 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MTN and JBL has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
MTN:
$5.62
JBL:
$7.47
MTN:
24.41
JBL:
48.75
MTN:
0.60
JBL:
2.61
MTN:
1.31
JBL:
1.21
MTN:
$2.83B
JBL:
$32.67B
MTN:
$2.12B
JBL:
$2.95B
MTN:
$499.82M
JBL:
$1.55B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTN vs. JBL — Risk / Return Rank
MTN
JBL
MTN vs. JBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) and Jabil Inc. (JBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MTN | JBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.39 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 5.99 | -6.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.20 | 15.50 | -15.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MTN | JBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 | 2.56 | -2.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.39 | 1.20 | -1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 | 0.96 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.37 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
MTN vs. JBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTN drawdown since its inception was -77.54%, smaller than the maximum JBL drawdown of -94.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTN and JBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTN | JBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.54% | -94.92% | +17.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.40% | -17.86% | -8.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.73% | -36.83% | -8.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.17% | -36.83% | -24.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.17% | -57.34% | -3.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.24% | -4.29% | -50.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.12% | -44.52% | +18.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.74% | 6.89% | +7.85% |
Volatility
MTN vs. JBL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) is 6.59%, while Jabil Inc. (JBL) has a volatility of 13.15%. This indicates that MTN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTN | JBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.59% | 13.15% | -6.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.27% | 32.41% | -6.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.65% | 41.78% | -8.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.70% | 37.80% | -6.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.29% | 37.12% | -4.83% |
Dividends
MTN vs. JBL - Dividend Comparison
MTN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, more than JBL's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JBL Jabil Inc. | 0.09% | 0.14% | 0.22% | 0.25% | 0.47% | 0.45% | 0.75% | 0.77% | 1.29% | 1.22% | 1.35% | 1.37% |
MTN Vail Resorts, Inc. | 6.47% | 6.69% | 4.74% | 3.86% | 3.21% | 0.54% | 0.63% | 2.94% | 2.79% | 1.98% | 2.01% | 1.95% |
Financials
MTN vs. JBL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vail Resorts, Inc. and Jabil Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MTN vs. JBL - Profitability Comparison
MTN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.15B and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.3%.
JBL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jabil Inc. reported a gross profit of 746.00M and revenue of 8.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.0%.
MTN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported an operating income of 494.13M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.0%.
JBL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jabil Inc. reported an operating income of 374.00M and revenue of 8.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
MTN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported a net income of 314.44M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 26.1%.
JBL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jabil Inc. reported a net income of 223.00M and revenue of 8.28B, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MTN and JBL have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JBL has higher volatility (13.15%) compared to MTN (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTN dropped -77.54% vs JBL's -94.92%.
JBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTN and JBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer