MTN vs. FUL
MTN (Vail Resorts, Inc.) and FUL (H.B. Fuller Company) are both stocks. MTN operates in Resorts & Casinos (Consumer Cyclical), while FUL operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, MTN returned 2.68%/yr vs 3.54%/yr for FUL. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MTN vs. FUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTN achieves a 5.09% return, which is significantly higher than FUL's 1.73% return. Over the past 10 years, MTN has underperformed FUL with an annualized return of 2.68%, while FUL has yielded a comparatively higher 3.54% annualized return.
MTN
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 9.40%
- YTD
- 5.09%
- 6M
- -1.45%
- 1Y
- -2.97%
- 3Y*
- -12.71%
- 5Y*
- -12.18%
- 10Y*
- 2.68%
FUL
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 4.84%
- 1Y
- 8.55%
- 3Y*
- -1.57%
- 5Y*
- -1.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.54%
MTN vs. FUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTN Vail Resorts, Inc. | 5.09% | -24.88% | -7.96% | -7.06% | -24.89% | 18.15% | 17.77% | 17.34% | 1.74% | 34.43% |
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | 1.73% | -10.46% | -16.19% | 14.97% | -10.59% | 57.84% | 2.15% | 22.42% | -19.84% | 12.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTN and FUL is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 1997 | 0.34 |
Fundamentals
MTN:
$5.62
FUL:
$2.88
MTN:
24.41
FUL:
20.81
MTN:
1.31
FUL:
0.96
MTN:
$2.83B
FUL:
$3.46B
MTN:
$2.12B
FUL:
$1.11B
MTN:
$499.82M
FUL:
$495.48M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTN vs. FUL — Risk / Return Rank
MTN
FUL
MTN vs. FUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) and H.B. Fuller Company (FUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MTN | FUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.07 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 0.32 | -0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.20 | 0.98 | -1.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MTN | FUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 | 0.25 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.39 | -0.06 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 | 0.11 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.27 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
MTN vs. FUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTN drawdown since its inception was -77.54%, which is greater than FUL's maximum drawdown of -68.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTN and FUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTN | FUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.54% | -68.25% | -9.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.40% | -26.97% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.73% | -43.45% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.17% | -43.45% | -17.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.17% | -56.29% | -4.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.24% | -28.49% | -26.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.12% | -18.76% | -7.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.74% | 8.70% | +6.04% |
Volatility
MTN vs. FUL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) is 6.59%, while H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) has a volatility of 11.03%. This indicates that MTN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTN | FUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.59% | 11.03% | -4.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.27% | 26.42% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.65% | 34.82% | -1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.70% | 29.38% | +2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.29% | 31.11% | +1.18% |
Dividends
MTN vs. FUL - Dividend Comparison
MTN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, more than FUL's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | 1.58% | 1.56% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 1.25% | 1.23% | 1.44% | 1.10% | 1.14% | 1.40% |
MTN Vail Resorts, Inc. | 6.47% | 6.69% | 4.74% | 3.86% | 3.21% | 0.54% | 0.63% | 2.94% | 2.79% | 1.98% | 2.01% | 1.95% |
Financials
MTN vs. FUL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vail Resorts, Inc. and H.B. Fuller Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MTN vs. FUL - Profitability Comparison
MTN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.15B and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.3%.
FUL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a gross profit of 240.99M and revenue of 770.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.
MTN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported an operating income of 494.13M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.0%.
FUL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported an operating income of 60.86M and revenue of 770.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.
MTN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported a net income of 314.44M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 26.1%.
FUL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a net income of 21.05M and revenue of 770.84M, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MTN and FUL have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FUL has higher volatility (11.03%) compared to MTN (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTN dropped -77.54% vs FUL's -68.25%.
FUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTN and FUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer