MTN vs. CNXC
MTN (Vail Resorts, Inc.) and CNXC (Concentrix Corporation) are both stocks. MTN operates in Resorts & Casinos (Consumer Cyclical), while CNXC operates in Information Technology Services (Technology). Over the past 5 years, MTN returned -12.18%/yr vs -27.31%/yr for CNXC. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MTN vs. CNXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTN achieves a 5.09% return, which is significantly higher than CNXC's -32.63% return.
MTN
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 9.40%
- YTD
- 5.09%
- 6M
- -1.45%
- 1Y
- -2.97%
- 3Y*
- -12.71%
- 5Y*
- -12.18%
- 10Y*
- 2.68%
CNXC
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 12.81%
- YTD
- -32.63%
- 6M
- -26.68%
- 1Y
- -49.86%
- 3Y*
- -29.25%
- 5Y*
- -27.31%
- 10Y*
- —
MTN vs. CNXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTN Vail Resorts, Inc. | 5.09% | -24.88% | -7.96% | -7.06% | -24.89% | 18.15% | 1.12% |
CNXC Concentrix Corporation | -32.63% | -1.39% | -55.03% | -25.36% | -24.91% | 81.22% | 23.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTN and CNXC is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020 | 0.34 |
Fundamentals
MTN:
$5.62
CNXC:
-$21.33
MTN:
1.31
CNXC:
0.17
MTN:
$2.83B
CNXC:
$9.95B
MTN:
$2.12B
CNXC:
$3.27B
MTN:
$499.82M
CNXC:
-$944.68M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTN vs. CNXC — Risk / Return Rank
MTN
CNXC
MTN vs. CNXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) and Concentrix Corporation (CNXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MTN | CNXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.87 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | -0.81 | +0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.20 | -1.34 | +1.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MTN | CNXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 | -0.82 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.39 | -0.57 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | -0.33 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
MTN vs. CNXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTN drawdown since its inception was -77.54%, smaller than the maximum CNXC drawdown of -87.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTN and CNXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTN | CNXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.54% | -87.86% | +10.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.40% | -61.71% | +35.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.73% | -76.50% | +30.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.17% | -87.86% | +26.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.24% | -85.48% | +30.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.12% | -47.65% | +21.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.74% | 37.32% | -22.58% |
Volatility
MTN vs. CNXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) is 6.59%, while Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) has a volatility of 15.12%. This indicates that MTN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTN | CNXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.59% | 15.12% | -8.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.27% | 51.98% | -25.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.65% | 61.40% | -27.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.70% | 48.26% | -16.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.29% | 49.78% | -17.49% |
Dividends
MTN vs. CNXC - Dividend Comparison
MTN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, more than CNXC's 5.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNXC Concentrix Corporation | 5.16% | 3.27% | 2.87% | 1.15% | 0.77% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MTN Vail Resorts, Inc. | 6.47% | 6.69% | 4.74% | 3.86% | 3.21% | 0.54% | 0.63% | 2.94% | 2.79% | 1.98% | 2.01% | 1.95% |
Financials
MTN vs. CNXC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vail Resorts, Inc. and Concentrix Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MTN vs. CNXC - Profitability Comparison
MTN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.15B and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.3%.
CNXC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Concentrix Corporation reported a gross profit of 849.66M and revenue of 2.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.0%.
MTN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported an operating income of 494.13M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.0%.
CNXC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Concentrix Corporation reported an operating income of 118.56M and revenue of 2.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.7%.
MTN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported a net income of 314.44M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 26.1%.
CNXC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Concentrix Corporation reported a net income of 21.59M and revenue of 2.50B, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MTN and CNXC have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNXC has higher volatility (15.12%) compared to MTN (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTN dropped -77.54% vs CNXC's -87.86%.
MTN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.09 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTN and CNXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer