MSTR vs. QBTS
MSTR (Strategy Inc) and QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — MSTR in Software - Application, QBTS in Computer Hardware. Over the past 3 years, MSTR returned 65.16%/yr vs 125.25%/yr for QBTS. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MSTR vs. QBTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTR achieves a -16.29% return, which is significantly lower than QBTS's -1.22% return.
MSTR
- 1D
- 5.61%
- 1M
- -32.19%
- YTD
- -16.29%
- 6M
- -30.75%
- 1Y
- -66.03%
- 3Y*
- 65.16%
- 5Y*
- 19.92%
- 10Y*
- 21.08%
QBTS
- 1D
- 8.30%
- 1M
- 14.44%
- YTD
- -1.22%
- 6M
- -9.18%
- 1Y
- 38.72%
- 3Y*
- 125.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTR vs. QBTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTR Strategy Inc | -16.29% | -47.53% | 358.54% | 346.15% | -55.64% |
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | -1.22% | 211.31% | 854.44% | -38.88% | -83.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTR and QBTS is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2022 | 0.26 |
Over the past year, MSTR and QBTS have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
MSTR:
$42.47B
QBTS:
$9.49B
MSTR:
-$40.19
QBTS:
-$1.08
MSTR:
79.74
QBTS:
704.19
MSTR:
1.16
QBTS:
8.44
MSTR:
$490.47M
QBTS:
$12.44M
MSTR:
$334.08M
QBTS:
$8.25M
MSTR:
$466.93M
QBTS:
-$399.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTR vs. QBTS — Risk / Return Rank
MSTR
QBTS
MSTR vs. QBTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Inc (MSTR) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSTR | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.15 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 0.55 | -1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | 0.96 | -2.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTR | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.94 | 0.36 | -1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.19 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
MSTR vs. QBTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTR drawdown since its inception was -99.86%, roughly equal to the maximum QBTS drawdown of -96.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTR and QBTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTR | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.86% | -96.67% | -3.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.53% | -71.01% | -5.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.42% | -79.17% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.15% | -42.32% | -30.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.47% | -65.80% | -20.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 52.19% | 40.50% | +11.69% |
Volatility
MSTR vs. QBTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Strategy Inc (MSTR) is 21.43%, while D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a volatility of 42.76%. This indicates that MSTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTR | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.43% | 42.76% | -21.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.80% | 76.88% | -20.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.82% | 108.49% | -37.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.87% | 151.19% | -60.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.77% | 151.19% | -77.42% |
Dividends
MSTR vs. QBTS - Dividend Comparison
Neither MSTR nor QBTS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MSTR vs. QBTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Strategy Inc and D-Wave Quantum Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTR and QBTS have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QBTS has higher volatility (42.76%) compared to MSTR (21.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTR dropped -99.86% vs QBTS's -96.67%.
QBTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTR and QBTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer