PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTR vs. BAB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSTR vs. BAB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategy Inc (MSTR) and Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MSTR is traded in USD, while BAB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BAB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTR achieves a -16.29% return, which is significantly higher than BAB.L's -17.23% return. Over the past 10 years, MSTR has outperformed BAB.L with an annualized return of 21.08%, while BAB.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.44% annualized return.


MSTR

1D
5.61%
1M
-32.19%
YTD
-16.29%
6M
-30.75%
1Y
-66.03%
3Y*
65.16%
5Y*
19.92%
10Y*
21.08%

BAB.L

1D
0.34%
1M
-3.48%
YTD
-17.23%
6M
-11.63%
1Y
-2.50%
3Y*
52.45%
5Y*
27.56%
10Y*
1.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTR vs. BAB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSTR
Strategy Inc
-16.29%-47.53%358.54%346.15%-74.00%40.13%172.42%11.65%-2.70%-33.49%
BAB.L
Babcock International Group plc
-17.23%168.92%25.85%47.98%-20.89%12.79%-54.17%42.49%-31.86%-16.07%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTR and BAB.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2007

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MSTR:

$42.47B

BAB.L:

£5.32B

EPS

MSTR:

-$40.19

BAB.L:

£0.94

PS Ratio

MSTR:

79.74

BAB.L:

0.56

PB Ratio

MSTR:

1.16

BAB.L:

7.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

MSTR:

$490.47M

BAB.L:

£9.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MSTR:

$334.08M

BAB.L:

£699.70M

EBITDA (TTM)

MSTR:

$466.93M

BAB.L:

£961.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTR vs. BAB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTR
MSTR Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

BAB.L
BAB.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
BAB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BAB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTR vs. BAB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Inc (MSTR) and Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSTRBAB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.02

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

-0.06

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.27

-0.16

-1.10

MSTR vs. BAB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTR Sharpe Ratio is -0.94, which is lower than the BAB.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTR and BAB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSTRBAB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.94

-0.07

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.78

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.04

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.14

-0.01

Drawdowns

MSTR vs. BAB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTR drawdown since its inception was -99.86%, which is greater than BAB.L's maximum drawdown of -84.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTR and BAB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTRBAB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.86%

-84.09%

-15.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.53%

-38.37%

-38.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.42%

-38.37%

-39.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.11%

-41.84%

-42.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.27%

-78.82%

-10.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.15%

-33.06%

-40.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.47%

-37.72%

-48.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

52.19%

15.30%

+36.89%

Volatility

MSTR vs. BAB.L - Volatility Comparison

Strategy Inc (MSTR) has a higher volatility of 21.43% compared to Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) at 12.48%. This indicates that MSTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTRBAB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.43%

12.48%

+8.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.80%

27.12%

+29.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.82%

36.34%

+34.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.87%

35.48%

+55.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.77%

38.85%

+34.92%

Dividends

MSTR vs. BAB.L - Dividend Comparison

MSTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAB.L
Babcock International Group plc
0.67%0.56%1.06%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.78%6.08%4.04%2.75%2.38%
MSTR
Strategy Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MSTR vs. BAB.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Strategy Inc and Babcock International Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
124.30M
2.54B
(MSTR) Total Revenue
(BAB.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. MSTR values in USD, BAB.L values in GBp

Frequently Asked Questions


MSTR and BAB.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTR and BAB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer