PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTR vs. AEP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSTR vs. AEP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategy Inc (MSTR) and Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc (AEP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MSTR is traded in USD, while AEP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AEP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTR achieves a -16.29% return, which is significantly lower than AEP.L's 10.98% return. Over the past 10 years, MSTR has outperformed AEP.L with an annualized return of 21.08%, while AEP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.90% annualized return.


MSTR

1D
5.61%
1M
-32.19%
YTD
-16.29%
6M
-30.75%
1Y
-66.03%
3Y*
65.16%
5Y*
19.92%
10Y*
21.08%

AEP.L

1D
1.91%
1M
-24.33%
YTD
10.98%
6M
15.48%
1Y
95.38%
3Y*
30.92%
5Y*
20.77%
10Y*
13.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTR vs. AEP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSTR
Strategy Inc
-16.29%-47.53%358.54%346.15%-74.00%40.13%172.42%11.65%-2.70%-33.49%
AEP.L
Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc
10.98%140.93%-2.29%-8.24%-0.30%22.51%4.76%5.61%-30.04%25.31%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTR and AEP.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2007

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MSTR:

$42.47B

AEP.L:

£594.92M

EPS

MSTR:

-$40.19

AEP.L:

£4.05

PS Ratio

MSTR:

79.74

AEP.L:

0.72

PB Ratio

MSTR:

1.16

AEP.L:

1.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

MSTR:

$490.47M

AEP.L:

£838.60M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MSTR:

$334.08M

AEP.L:

£214.57M

EBITDA (TTM)

MSTR:

$466.93M

AEP.L:

£230.87M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTR vs. AEP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTR
MSTR Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

AEP.L
AEP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AEP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AEP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTR vs. AEP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Inc (MSTR) and Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc (AEP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSTRAEP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.40

-0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

2.74

-3.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.27

14.17

-15.44

MSTR vs. AEP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTR Sharpe Ratio is -0.94, which is lower than the AEP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTR and AEP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSTRAEP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.94

2.09

-3.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.60

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.39

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.15

-0.02

Drawdowns

MSTR vs. AEP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTR drawdown since its inception was -99.86%, which is greater than AEP.L's maximum drawdown of -77.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTR and AEP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTRAEP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.86%

-77.26%

-22.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.53%

-34.60%

-41.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.42%

-34.60%

-42.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.11%

-35.42%

-48.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.27%

-64.61%

-24.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.15%

-33.35%

-39.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.47%

-33.79%

-52.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

52.19%

6.71%

+45.48%

Volatility

MSTR vs. AEP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strategy Inc (MSTR) is 21.43%, while Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc (AEP.L) has a volatility of 30.82%. This indicates that MSTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTRAEP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.43%

30.82%

-9.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.80%

38.16%

+18.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.82%

45.56%

+25.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.87%

34.43%

+56.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.77%

35.66%

+38.11%

Dividends

MSTR vs. AEP.L - Dividend Comparison

MSTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AEP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AEP.L
Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc
4.28%4.80%1.81%4.78%0.51%0.10%0.07%0.41%0.52%0.39%
MSTR
Strategy Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MSTR vs. AEP.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Strategy Inc and Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


120.00M140.00M160.00M180.00M200.00M220.00M240.00M20222023202420252026
124.30M
235.87M
(MSTR) Total Revenue
(AEP.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. MSTR values in USD, AEP.L values in GBp

Frequently Asked Questions


MSTR and AEP.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTR and AEP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer